GRAHAM

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (29 total)

• Manaster v. Al Coletta, 490 So. 2d 243 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986)
  …PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Gregg v. U.S. Industries, Inc., 715 F. 2d 1522 (11th Cir.), on petitions for reh’g and petition for clarification, 721 F. 2d 345 (11th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 960, 104 S.Ct. 2173, 80 L.Ed.2d 556 (1984); Canell v. Arcola Housing Corp., 65 So. 2d 849 (Fla.1953); Broward National Bank of Fort Lauderdale v. Bethel, 341 So. 2d 1012 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977); § 725.01, Fla.Stat. (1981).…
• United States v. Gennaro J. Angiulo, 897 F.2d 1169 (1st Cir. 1990)
  …d to the jury; and (3) concerns an important point in the trial so that the failure to give it seriously impaired the defendant’s ability to effectively present a given defense.” United States v. Gibson, 726 F. 2d 869, 874 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 960, 104 S.Ct. 2174, 80 L.Ed.2d 557 (1984) (quoting United States v. Grissom, 645 F. 2d 461, 464 (5th Cir.1981)). Applying these standards to the facts before us, it is clear that the matter of voice identification was of importance to the defendants’…
• United States v. Jones, 913 F.2d 1552 (11th Cir. 1990)
  …trial court has broad discretion under Rule 611(b) to determine the permissible scope of cross-examination and will not be reversed except for clear abuse of that discretion. United States v. Bent, 707 F. 2d 1190, 1194 (11th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 960, 104 S.Ct. 2174, 80 L.Ed.2d 557 (1984). Whether these inquiries by the government as to Cavaliere’s employment exceeded the permissible scope of cross-examination is a close question. After reviewing Cavaliere’s entire testimony on direct examinatio…