GLOVER

v.

NEW YORK

Citator

Cited By (31 total)

• United States v. Stanley, 483 U.S. 669 (U.S. 1987)
  …n-of-command concerns at the heart of Chappell and cases such as Gaspard v. United States, 713 F. 2d 1097, 1103-1104 (CA5 1983) (plaintiff was ordered to expose himself to radiation from nuclear test), cert. denied sub nom. Sheehan v. United States, 466 U. S. 975 (1984), are thus not implicated. Second [*680], Stanley argues that there is no evidence that this injury was “incident to service,” because we do not know the precise character of the drug testing program, the titles and roles of the various indiv…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Jacobs v. Singletary, 952 F.2d 1282 (11th Cir. 1992)
  …tor’ in the [defendant’s] conviction.” Williams v. Kemp, 846 F. 2d 1276, 1281 (11th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 494 U.S. 1090, 110 S.Ct. 1836, 108 L.Ed.2d 965 (1990) (quoting Jameson v. Wainwright, 719 F. 2d 1125, 1126-27 (11th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 975, 104 S.Ct. 2355, 80 L.Ed.2d 827 (1984)). The introduction of graphic photographic evidence rarely renders a proceeding fundamentally unfair. Futch v. Dugger, 874 F. 2d at 1487; see also, e.g., id. (photograph of victim, nude, showing wounds made b…
• Bundy v. Dugger, 850 F.2d 1402 (11th Cir. 1988)
  …to an issue of state law. An evi-dentiary ruling is a cognizable ground for federal habeas corpus relief if it deprived the state court defendant of fundamental fairness. See Jameson v. Wainwright, 719 F. 2d 1125, 1126 (11th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 975, 104 S.Ct. 2355, 80 L.Ed. 2d 827 (1984). We agree with the district court, however, that the ruling did not deprive Bundy of fundamental fairness. To constitute a denial of fundamental fairness, the evidence at issue must be crucial and highly signi…