BLAIR

v.

PENNSYLVANIA ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (49 total)

• State v. Nuckolls, 617 So. 2d 724 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993)
  …aragraph A was overbroad and the items seized thereunder were properly suppressed. However, the invalidation of a portion of a warrant does not invalidate the entire warrant. United States v. Gomez-Soto, 723 F. 2d 649, 654 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 977, 104 S.Ct. 2360, 80 L.Ed.2d 831 (1984). Accordingly, the items seized under paragraphs B through F are admissible as evidence in the case against the appellees. REVERSED and REMANDED. W. SHARP, J. and COWART, J.A., Senior Judge, concur. . See als…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• United States v. Rigoberto Moya-Gomez, 860 F.2d 706 (7th Cir. 1988)
  …Ed.2d 367 (1984); see also United States v. Guzzino, 810 F. 2d 687, 696-97 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1030, 107 S.Ct. 1957, 95 L.Ed.2d 529 (1987); Perry, 747 F. 2d at 1169; United States v. Roman, 728 F. 2d 846, 858 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 977, 104 S.Ct. 2360, 80 L.Ed.2d 832 (1984). We first address Mr. Herrera’s contention that the jury improperly convicted him merely because he was at the Oak Creek house on the morning of his arrest. In this regard, we note that it is well established…
• United States v. Washington, 782 F.2d 807 (9th Cir. 1986)