SCARBOROUGH

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (35 total)

• United States v. Hogan, 986 F.2d 1364 (11th Cir. 1993)
  …pt, Trupei cites two Eighth Circuit cases. United States v. Willis, 774 F. 2d 258, 259 (8th Cir.1985); United States v. Bentley, 706 F. 2d 1498, 1507 (8th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 830, 104 S.Ct. 107, 78 L.Ed.2d 110 (1983), and cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1209, 104 S.Ct. 2397, 81 L.Ed.2d 354 (1984). Those cases noted the value of, but did not require, authentication by the officer who prepared the transcripts. They did not hold that testimony from each officer who prepared a transcript as to its accurac…
• Thomasina Mack v. The Great Atl. & Pac. TEA Co., Inc., 871 F.2d 179 (1st Cir. 1989)
  …strued as a motion to amend plaintiffs complaint, Fed.R.Civ.P. 15, it was within the court’s discretion to refuse the amendment, given the age and posture of the litigation. See, e.g., James v. Watt, 716 F. 2d 71, 77-78 (1st Cir.1983), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1209, 104 5.Ct. 2397, 81 L.Ed.2d 354 (1984). V. DISCOVERY RULINGS Plaintiff essays a parting shot. She contends that the district court improperly restricted her discovery efforts, thereby precluding her from unearthing evidence which might have defeat…
• Camps Newfound/Owatonna, Inc. v. Town OF Harrison, 520 U.S. 564 (U.S. 1997)
  …commerce or even, to some extent, regulate it”); James v. Watt, 716 F. 2d 71, 73 (CA1 1983) (Breyer, J.) (noting that “the strong Madison/Marshall ‘preemptive’ view of the Interstate Commerce Clause is no longer the law of the land”), cert. denied, 467 U. S. 1209 (1984).7 [*614] Indeed, the Court’s early view that the Commerce Clause, on its own, prohibited state impediments to interstate commerce such that “Congress cannot re-grant, or in any manner reconvey to the states that power,” Cooley v. Board of War…