TERRELL

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Nickens, 955 F.2d 112 (1st Cir. 1992)
  …Perez, 767 F. 2d 1, 4 (1st Cir.1985). A defendant must prove that the alleged violation prejudiced his case to succeed in obtaining a reversal on appeal. United States v. Hemmer, 729 F. 2d 10, 13 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, Randazza v. United States, 467 U.S. 1218, 104 S.Ct. 2666, 81 L.Ed.2d 371 (1984). We are satisfied that Nickens was not prejudiced by the government’s action. In this case the district court was satisfied that the government’s failure to produce Nickens’ oral statement was not a bad faith…
• United States v. Spinosa, 982 F.2d 620 (1st Cir. 1992)
  …3 (1st Cir.1989). The burden rests with the party claiming a violation of Rule 16 to demonstrate resulting prejudice. United States v. Formanczyk, 949 F. 2d 526, 530 (1st Cir.1991); United States v. Hemmer, 729 F. 2d 10, 13 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1218, 104 S.Ct. 2666, 81 L.Ed.2d 371 (1984). Spinosa argued at trial, and again on appeal, that the government had known since October, 1990, through Special Agent Farley, that Spinosa might have had a drug connection in New York, and that there was, the…