MORROW

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Khoury, 901 F.2d 948 (11th Cir. 1990)
  …his lawyer made a choice between plausible courses of action, such as presenting arguments or evidence helpful to one client but harmful to the other. Mers, 701 F. 2d at 1328; Barham v. United States, 724 F. 2d 1529, 1532 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1230, 104 S.Ct. 2687, 81 L.Ed.2d 882 (1984); Oliver, 782 F. 2d at 1524; Baty v. Balkcom, 661 F. 2d at 395 (actual conflict). In this case there was simultaneous representation of two defendants; we do not believe, under the circumstances, that the fact…
• United States v. Lamon, 930 F.2d 1183 (7th Cir. 1991)
  …officials does not differ from that of the magistrates referred to in some of the cited cases. . Accord United States v. Williams, 897 F. 2d 1034, 1039 (10th Cir.1990); see also United States v. Landis, 726 F. 2d 540, 542 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1230, 104 S.Ct. 2688, 81 L.Ed.2d 882 (1984). . Cf. United States v. Williams, 897 F. 2d 1034, 1039 (10th Cir.1990) (in case involving long-term conspiracy, noting likelihood that "records, together with the fruits and instru-mentalities of such an exten…
• The Kan. City S. Ry. Co. v. McNAMARA, 817 F.2d 368 (5th Cir. 1987)
  …tax is facially discriminatory, after which the tax must be justified, if possible, by the state. See, e.g., Burlington Northern Railroad Co. v. Lennen, 715 F. 2d 494, 497 (10th Cir.1983) (discussing discriminatory property tax rates), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1230, 104 S.Ct. 2690, 81 L.Ed.2d 884 (1984). It may be that in an appropriate case we would allow the state to save a facially discriminatory tax by showing that it is necessary to “compensate” for some state or local tax — a tax applicable to “other c…

  ← 1 / 2 →