UNITED STATES

v.

TATE ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (17 total)

• Bruno v. State, 807 So. 2d 55 (Fla. 2001)
  …hat he had not been negligent in failing to present an insanity defense during the guilt phase, than by an interest in securing a future psychiatric examination for his client. In Douglas v. Wainwnght, 714 F. 2d 1532, 1557 (11th Cir.1983), vacated, 468 U.S. 1206, 104 S.Ct. 3575, 82 L.Ed.2d 874 (1984), opinion reinstated by, 739 F. 2d 531 (C.A.Fla.1984), the Eleventh Circuit noted that “[t]he most egregious examples of ineffectiveness do not always arise because of what counsel did not do, but from what he d…
• Douglas v. State, 575 So. 2d 165 (Fla. 1991)
  …The court remanded to the federal district court, mandating that the writ be issued “unless the state resentenc-es appellant in appropriate proceedings within a reasonable time.” Douglas v. Wainwright, 714 F. 2d 1532, 1558 (11th Cir.1983), vacated, 468 U.S. 1206, 104 S.Ct. 3575, 82 L.Ed.2d 874, reinstated, 739 F. 2d [*166] 531 (11th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1208, 105 S.Ct. 1170, 84 L.Ed.2d 321 (1985). A resentencing hearing was held wherein the defense was allowed to introduce mitigating evidence…
• Francis v. State, 529 So. 2d 670 (Fla. 1988)
  …ctiveness, and in the second, it remanded for a hearing to determine that issue. The first such case, issued before Strickland was decided but subsequently reaffirmed, was Douglas v. Wainwright, 714 F. 2d 1532 (11th Cir.1983), vacated and remanded, 468 U.S. 1206, 104 S.Ct. 3575, 82 L.Ed.2d 874, adhered to on remand, 739 F. 2d 531 (11th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1208, 105 S.Ct. 1170, 84 L.Ed.2d 321 (1985). There, the Eleventh Circuit found prejudicial ineffectiveness when counsel both failed to inves…