MCDONALD ET AL.

v.

BURROWS, SHERIFF OF WICHITA COUNTY, TEXAS, ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Williams v. A.L. Lockhart, 862 F.2d 155 (8th Cir. 1988)
  …t. at 1078. “Something more than mere disagreement [with the previous habeas court] must be shown to justify a successive habe-as petition.” Walker v. Lockhart, 726 F. 2d 1238, 1250 (8th Cir.1984) (en banc) (Arnold, J., concurring), cert. dismissed, 468 U.S. 1222, 105 S.Ct. 17, 82 L.Ed.2d 912; mandate recalled June 13, 1984; see also Walker v. Lockhart, 763 F. 2d 942, 947 (8th Cir.1985) (en banc) (same case), cert. denied, 478 U.S. 1020, 106 S.Ct. 3332, 92 L.Ed.2d 738 (1986). In Kuhlmann v. Wilson, 477 U.S.…
• Tucker v. Commonwealth Land Title Ins. Co., 800 F.2d 1054 (11th Cir. 1986)
  …n justifying relief from the operation of the judgment,” and to alleviate the “draconian effect” of Rule 77(d), courts have used Rule 60(b) to extend the time for appeal. Wilson v. Atwood Group, 725 F. 2d 255, 257 (5th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 468 U.S. 1222, 105 S.Ct. 17, 82 L.Ed.2d 912 (1984). Rule 60(b) “is an extraordinary remedy [,however,] which may be invoked only upon a showing of exceptional circumstances,” Griffin v. Swim Tech Corp., 722 F. 2d 677, 680 (11th Cir.1984), and, most courts using…
• In re Longardner & Assocs., Inc., 855 F.2d 455 (7th Cir. 1988)
  …ing is plain. We have consistently held that the simple failure of the clerk to mail notice of the entry [*464] of the judgment, without more, does not permit relief to a party who has failed to appeal within the prescribed time.”); cert. dismissed, 468 U.S. 1222, 105 S.Ct. 17, 82 L.Ed.2d 912 (1984); Mennen Co. v. Gillette Co., 719 F. 2d 568, 570 (2d Cir.1983) (“mere failure of the clerk to give the parties notification ... does not ... warrant an extension of time to appeal”); see also C. Wright & A. Miller…