CESSNA AIRCRAFT CO.
v.
BLEVINS

U.S. | 1984-08-27
No. 84-37
468 U.S. 1228 Supreme Court of the United States (1984) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Charlette A. Karns v. Emerson Elec. Co., 817 F.2d 1452 (10th Cir. 1987)
    …ry’s determination of [damages] is considered inviolate.” Barnes v. Smith, 305 F. 2d 226, 228 (10th Cir.1962); accord Aspen Highlands Skiing Corp., 738 F. 2d at 1526; Blevins v. Cessna Aircraft Co., 728 F. 2d 1576, 1579 (10th Cir.), cert. dismissed, 468 U.S. 1228, 105 S.Ct. 32, 82 L.Ed.2d 923 (1984). Moreover, the trial court’s denial of defendant’s motion for new trial or remittitur is entitled to considerable deference on appeal, and will not be disturbed absent a gross abuse of discretion. Blevins, 728 F…
  • Orthokinetics, Inc. v. Safety Travel Chairs, Inc., 806 F.2d 1565 (Fed. Cir. 1986)
    …U.S. 1026,104 S.Ct. 1284, 79 L.Ed.2d 687 (1984), The Wheelchair Book cannot anticipate the claimed inventions set forth in claims 5 and 6. See RCA Corp. v. Applied Digital Data Systems, Inc., 730 F. 2d 1440, 221 USPQ 385 (Fed.Cir.), cert. dismissed, 468 U.S. 1228, 105 S.Ct. 32, 82 L.Ed.2d 923 (1984). There being substantial evidence capable of supporting the jury’s finding of no anticipation, and thus a failure of Safety to prove anticipation, the granting of Safety’s motion for JNOV on anticipation by The…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw