CESSNA AIRCRAFT CO.
v.
BLEVINS
CESSNA AIRCRAFT CO.
BLEVINS
468 U.S. 1228
Supreme Court of the United States (1984)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Charlette A. Karns v. Emerson Elec. Co., 817 F.2d 1452 (10th Cir. 1987)…ry’s determination of [damages] is considered inviolate.” Barnes v. Smith, 305 F. 2d 226, 228 (10th Cir.1962); accord Aspen Highlands Skiing Corp., 738 F. 2d at 1526; Blevins v. Cessna Aircraft Co., 728 F. 2d 1576, 1579 (10th Cir.), cert. dismissed, 468 U.S. 1228, 105 S.Ct. 32, 82 L.Ed.2d 923 (1984). Moreover, the trial court’s denial of defendant’s motion for new trial or remittitur is entitled to considerable deference on appeal, and will not be disturbed absent a gross abuse of discretion. Blevins, 728 F…
-
Orthokinetics, Inc. v. Safety Travel Chairs, Inc., 806 F.2d 1565 (Fed. Cir. 1986)…U.S. 1026,104 S.Ct. 1284, 79 L.Ed.2d 687 (1984), The Wheelchair Book cannot anticipate the claimed inventions set forth in claims 5 and 6. See RCA Corp. v. Applied Digital Data Systems, Inc., 730 F. 2d 1440, 221 USPQ 385 (Fed.Cir.), cert. dismissed, 468 U.S. 1228, 105 S.Ct. 32, 82 L.Ed.2d 923 (1984). There being substantial evidence capable of supporting the jury’s finding of no anticipation, and thus a failure of Safety to prove anticipation, the granting of Safety’s motion for JNOV on anticipation by The…