IN RE DISBARMENT OF STONER

Citator

Cited By

• Lyng v. Payne, 476 U.S. 926 (U.S. 1986)
  …onged this litigation by vacating the first judgment entered by the Court of Appeals in 1983 and remanding for further consideration in the light of our decision in Heckler v. Community Health Services, Inc., 467 U. S. 51 (1984). See Block v. Payne, 469 U. S. 807 (1984). In light of the possible incongruity of considering this challenge 13 years after the natural disaster that triggered the loan obligations, moreover, it is important to emphasize that there has been no suggestion of dilatoriness by responde…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Kevan Berkovitz v. United States, 822 F.2d 1322 (3d Cir. 1987)
  …ts' claim was based on a failure to perform a discretionary function, i.e. to warn. Id. at 830. Nor do we believe the government’s broad position is supported by Hylin v. United States, 755 F. 2d 551 (7th Cir.1985) (Hylin II), following remand from 469 U.S. 807, 105 S.Ct. 65, 83 L.Ed.2d 16 (1984). In that opinion, the court directed dismissal of a complaint alleging negligence by a mine inspector in failing to discover a mine operator’s noncompliance with mandatory safety regulations. The court held that t…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Boruski v. The United States, 803 F.2d 1421 (7th Cir. 1986)
  …rcraft. These functions were held to be exempt under the FTCA’s discretionary function exemption. Id. at 821, 104 S.Ct. at 2769. The Supreme Court also taught this court something about the discretionary function exemption in United States v. Hylin, 469 U.S. 807, 105 S.Ct. 65, 83 L.Ed.2d 16 (1984) (remanding 715 F. 2d 1206 (7th Cir.1983) for further consideration in light of S.A. Empresa), instructing that negligence in the implementation and enforcement of mandatory federal mine safety regulations was immu…