CORY ET AL.

v.

WESTERN OIL & GAS ASSN. ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Burger King Corp. v. Rudzewicz, 471 U.S. 462 (U.S. 1985)
  …r these circumstances would offend the fundamental fairness which is the touchstone of due process.” Ibid. Burger King appealed the Eleventh Circuit’s judgment to this Court pursuant to 28 U. S. C. § 1254(2), and we postponed probable jurisdiction. 469 U. S. 814 (1984). Because it is unclear whether the Eleventh Circuit actually held that Fla. Stat. § 48.193(1)(g) (Supp. 1984) itself is unconstitutional as applied to the circumstances of this case, we conclude that jurisdiction by appeal does not properly l…
• City of Okla. City v. Tuttle, 471 U.S. 808 (U.S. 1985)
  …ranted certiorari because the Court of Appeals’ holding that proof of a single incident of unconstitutional activity by a police officer could suffice to establish municipal liability seemed to conflict with the decisions of other Courts of Appeals. 469 U. S. 814 (1984). See, e. g., Languirand v. Hayden, 717 F. 2d 220, 228-230 (CA5 1983); Wellington v. Daniels, 717 F. 2d 932, 936-937 (CA4 1983). But cf. Owens v. Haas, 601 F. 2d 1242, 1246-1247 (CA2 1979).2 We reverse. [*815] II Before proceeding to the meri…
• Garrett v. United States, 471 U.S. 773 (U.S. 1985)
  …t the Washington importation offense and the CCE offense were not the same under the Double Jeopardy Clause; hence successive prosecutions and cumulative sentences for these offenses were permissible. We granted certiorari to consider this question. 469 U. S. 814 (1984). h — I This case presents two of the three aspects of the Double Jeopardy Clause identified in North Carolina v. Pearce, 395 U. S. 711, 717 (1969): protection against a second prosecution for the Washington importation conviction; and prote…