OTIS HUNTER AND ONAH MAE HUNTER, APPELLANTS,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
OTIS HUNTER AND ONAH MAE HUNTER, APPELLANTS,
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
215 So. 2d 69
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1968)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 12 cases
Opinion of the Court
Affirmed on the authority of Holliday v. State, Fla.App.1958, 104 So.2d 137; Alspaugh v. State, Fla.App.1961, 133 So.2d 587; Miller v. State, Fla.App.1964, 170 So. 2d 319; Brown v. State, Fla.App.1966, 184 So.2d 691.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Gunter v. Gunter, 219 So. 2d 743 (Fla. 1st DCA 1969)…o declare that the welfare of the children required a modification of the custodial provisions of the said final decree. In our opinion, this appeal is controlled by the principals which we recognized in the analogous case of Albritton v. Carraway, 215 So. 2d 69 (1968), involving a petition to change the child custody provisions of a divorce decree, in which case we said: “A consideration of every principal applicable to the judicial review of cases of this kind leads us to uphold the order appealed from:…
-
Strickland v. Jacobs, 235 So. 2d 747 (Fla. 1st DCA 1970)…judgment for that of the chancellor as to questions of fact determined by him, where substantial, competent evidence supports the chancellor’s determination. All of these rules were similarly applied in our recent decision in Albritton v. Carraway, 215 So. 2d 69 (1968), where the plaintiff-wife in a divorce suit appealed from an order of a circuit court denying her petition for modification of the child-custody provisions of the divorce decree. In the course of our opinion we said: “A consideration of ever…
-
Alfreda Leona Brandt v. Brandt, 217 So. 2d 573 (Fla. 1st DCA 1968)…een living in apparent comfort and wellbeing for the preceding five or more years. No reversible error has been demonstrated by the appellant in regard to custody in this case. Green v. Green, 137 Fla. 359, 188 So. 355 (1939); Albritton v. Carraway, 215 So. 2d 69, opinion of this court filed October 10, 1968. The final question we are asked to review is appellant’s entitlement to alimony notwithstanding the finding that the Missouri divorce decree was valid and binding. As stated earlier, the Missouri decre…
Previewing 3 of 7 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Holliday v. State, 104 So. 2d 137 (Fla. 1st DCA 1958)
- Amos H. Miller and Doris Miller v. State, 170 So. 2d 319 (Fla. 2d DCA 1964)
- Mathis Brown and Samuel Stewart v. State, 184 So. 2d 691 (Fla. 3d DCA 1966)
- Alspaugh v. State, 133 So. 2d 587 (Fla. 2d DCA 1961)
- Swinging Door, Inc. v. State Rd. Dep't OF Fla., 133 So. 2d 587 (Fla. 1st DCA 1961)