NEAL

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Marmon Dennis Record, 873 F.2d 1363 (10th Cir. 1989)
  …the jury. The jury was not given a separate instruction at the close of the case. We review the trial court’s decision to allow this testimony for an abuse of discretion. United States v. Neal, 718 F. 2d 1505, 1509-10 (10th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 818, 105 S.Ct. 87, 83 L.Ed.2d 34 (1984). Our analysis of this issue requires us to briefly summarize the development of Rule 404(b) law in this circuit. In United States v. Nolan, 551 F. 2d 266 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 904, 98 S.Ct. 302, 54…
• United States v. Esch, 832 F.2d 531 (10th Cir. 1987)
  …is relevant lies within the sound discretion of the trial court, and the court’s determination will not be disturbed absent a clear showing of an abuse of that discretion. United States v. Neal, 718 F. 2d 1505, 1509-10 (10th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 818, 105 S.Ct. 87, 83 L.Ed.2d 34 (1984). A trial court also has broad discretion to determine whether otherwise relevant evidence should be excluded if the probative value of the evidence is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice. Id…
• United States v. Alexander, 849 F.2d 1293 (10th Cir. 1988)
  …tbo, 576 F. 2d 285 (10th Cir.1978); Sparrow v. United States, 402 F. 2d 826 (10th Cir.1968). The district court is granted broad discretion in ruling on the relevancy of evidence. United States v. Neal, 718 F. 2d 1505 (10th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 818, 105 S.Ct. 87, 83 L.Ed.2d 34 (1984). Whereas all relevant evidence is considered admissible, unless otherwise properly excluded, evidence which is not relevant is not admissible. Fed.Rules Evid.Rule 402, 28 U.S.C.A. In reviewing the evidentiary ruli…