BOSS ET AL.

v.

INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF BOILERMAKERS, IRON SHIPBUILDERS, BLACKSMITHS, FORGERS & HELPERS

Citator

Cited By

• Garrido v. Burger King Corp., 558 So. 2d 79 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990)
  …e terms of the Copyright Act if plaintiffs causes of action are “equivalent to any of the exclusive rights within the general scope of copyright as specified by section 106.” Crow v. Wainwright, 720 F. 2d 1224, 1225-26 (11th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 819, 105 S.Ct. 89, 83 L.Ed.2d 35 (1984). Application of the Copyright Act to Plaintiffs Claims a. ' Conversion and Theft Claims Plaintiffs claims for conversion and theft of the advertising campaign ideas conveyed to Burger King are preempted under s…
• United States v. Frank Church, 955 F.2d 688 (11th Cir. 1992)
  …eement on an overall objective, by showing that a defendant agreed personally to commit two predicate acts and therefore to participate in a “single objective” conspiracy. See United States v. Carter, 721 F. 2d 1514, 1531 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 819, 105 S.Ct. 89, 83 L.Ed.2d 36 (1984). Here, the government presented sufficient evidence that Church agreed personally to commit two predicate acts of selling cocaine. The existence of the conspiracy agreement can be inferred from “the conduct of t…
• United States v. Kragness, 830 F.2d 842 (8th Cir. 1987)
  …, 474 U.S. 971, 106 S.Ct. 336, 88 L.Ed.2d 321 (1985); United States v. Tille, 729 F. 2d 615, 619 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 845, 105 S.Ct. 156, 83 L.Ed.2d 93 (1984); United States v. Carter, 721 F. 2d 1514, 1528-31 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 819, 105 S.Ct. 89, 83 L.Ed.2d 36 (1984). . The defendants also contend that acts 11(a) and 11(b) are similarly defective. However, as Caspersen observes, Brief of Appellant Caspersen at 10, the government adduced no evidence concerning acts 11(a) and 1…