GREENSBORO NEWS CO. ET AL.

v.

FLANNERY, JUDGE ASSIGNED TO UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA, ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (26 total)

• Sierra Club v. Secretary OF the Army, 820 F.2d 513 (1st Cir. 1987)
  …1168 (D.D.C.1985), we decline to join them. To be sure, “section 2412 is a limited waiver of sovereign immunity [and as such] it is to be narrowly construed and strictly observed.” Lane v. United States, 727 F. 2d 18, 20-21 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 829, 105 S.Ct. 113, 83 L.Ed.2d 57 (1984). Nevertheless, after giving due weight to this precept, we find that settled rules of statutory construction and the purpose and underlying public policy of the statute conduce to a more expansive reading of the…
• Grubb v. Fed. Deposit Ins. Corp. (successor-in-interest to First Nat'l Bank & Tr. Co. of Okla. City), 868 F.2d 1151 (10th Cir. 1989)
  …e FDIC tries to avoid this option, however, because it decreases public confidence in the banking system and may deprive depositors of the uninsured portions of their funds. FDIC v. Merchants Nat’l Bank, 725 F. 2d 634, 637 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 829, 105 S.Ct. 114, 83 L.Ed.2d 57 (1984). The second, and preferred, alternative is to initiate a “purchase and assumption” transaction (P & A). In this type of transaction, the FDIC as receiver arranges to sell acceptable assets of the failed bank to…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Motorcity OF Jacksonville, Ltd. v. Se. Bank N.A., 83 F.3d 1317 (11th Cir. 1996)
  …nsic evidence not meeting the requirements of § 1823(e), including “intent of the parties” and the “surrounding circumstances,” to determine whether the bank’s participation in a loan was guaranteed by the Farmers Home Administration), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 829, 105 S.Ct. 114, 83 L.Ed.2d 57 (1984); FDIC v. Bay Street Dev. Corp., 32 F. 3d 636, 639-40 (1st Cir.1994) (“[O]f course, extrinsic evidence of additional [loan] terms is inadmissible against FDIC.”); RTC v. Daddona, 9 F. 3d 312, 319 (3rd Cir.1993) (“…