PLOTNICK
v.
OHIO
PLOTNICK
OHIO
469 U.S. 836
Supreme Court of the United States (1984)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 11 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (11 total)
-
Litman v. Mass. Mut. Life Ins. Co., 825 F.2d 1506 (11th Cir. 1987)…Auto Transportation, S.A., 763 F. 2d 745 (5th Cir.1985); Bankers Trust Co. v. Bethlehem Steel Corp., 761 F. 2d 943 (3d Cir.1985); In re Beverly Hills Bancorp., 752 F. 2d 1334 (9th Cir.1984); Devines v. Maier, 728 F. 2d 876 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 836, 105 S.Ct. 130, 83 L.Ed.2d 71 (1984); Stamper v. Baskerville, 724 F. 2d 1106 (4th Cir.1984); City of Cleveland v. Federal Power Comm’n, 561 F. 2d 344 (D.C.Cir.1977); Crane Co. v. American Standard, Inc., 490 F. 2d 332 (2d Cir.1973); In re United Sta…
-
United States v. Campbell, 843 F.2d 1089 (8th Cir. 1988)…reasonable suspicion or probable cause. See United States v. Mancini, 802 F. 2d 1326 (11th Cir.1986); United States v. Dyer, 784 F. 2d 812, 815 (7th Cir.1986); United States v. $84,000 Currency, 717 F. 2d 1090, 1095-97 (7th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 836, 105 S.Ct. 131, 83 L.Ed.2d 71 (1984); United States v. Black, 675 F. 2d 129 (7th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1068, 103 S.Ct. 1520, 75 L.Ed.2d 945 (1983).…
-
United States v. Nichols, 841 F.2d 1485 (10th Cir. 1988)…time of the offense continues to be accepted in civil forfeiture proceedings today. See, e.g., United States v. “Monkey”, 725 F. 2d 1007, 1012 (5th Cir.1984); United States v. $84,000 U.S. Currency, 717 F. 2d 1090, 1102 (7th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 836, 105 S.Ct. 131, 83 L.Ed.2d 71 (1984); Simons v. United States, 541 F. 2d 1351, 1352 (9th Cir.1976); cf. United States v. Wingfield, 822 F. 2d 1466, 1475 (10th Cir.1987) (referring to “the use of the doctrine of relation back as it is explained in Un…
Previewing 3 of 11 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence