FRANTA

v.

FLORIDA

Citator

Cited By

• Amstar Corp. & Enviro-Clear Co., Inc. v. Envirotech Corp. & Energy Fuels Nuclear, Inc., 823 F.2d 1538 (Fed. Cir. 1987)
  …c. v. AMF, Inc., 782 F. 2d 995, 1002, 228 U.S.P.Q. 562, 567 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 106 S.Ct. 3275, 91 L.Ed.2d 565 (1986), Roche Prod., Inc. v. Bolar Pharmaceutical Co., 733 F. 2d 858, 865, 221 U.S.P.Q. 937, 942 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 856, 105 S.Ct. 183, 83 L.Ed.2d 117 (1984). We may reverse the district court’s denial only if Amstar shows that the district court abused its discretion. Windsurfing Int’l, 782 F. 2d at 1002, 228 U.S.P.Q. at 567. [*1549] Amstar argues, in essence, that…
• United States v. Nunez, 801 F.2d 1260 (11th Cir. 1986)
  …e considered the issue have concluded that counsel’s tardiness or absence cannot be characterized as contempt in the presence of the court. See, e.g., United States v. Onu, 730 F. 2d 253, 255-56 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, sub nom. Washington v. U.S., 469 U.S. 856,105 S.Ct. 182, 83 L.Ed.2d 116 (1984); In re Allis, 531 F. 2d 1391, 1392 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 900, 97 S.Ct. 267, 50 L.Ed.2d 185 (1976); United States v. Delahanty, 488 F. 2d 396, 397 (6th Cir.1973); Jessup v. Clark, 490 F. 2d 1068, 1072…
• Krasnow v. Navarro, 909 F.2d 451 (11th Cir. 1990)
  …ently confronted the Fifth Circuit when a state legislator, who was acting as defense counsel in a criminal trial, did not appear for trial because he was attending a legislative session. United States v. Onu, 730 F. 2d 253 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 856, 105 S.Ct. 182, 83 L.Ed.2d 116 (1984). The Fifth Circuit found that the importance of appellant attending the legislative session was irrelevant. The court stated: Requiring a lawyer to adhere to the proper orders of a federal court does not threat…