SCHREIBER

v.

GENCORP, INC., ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Stevens, 935 F.2d 1380 (3d Cir. 1991)
  …tal, the trial court [is] required to view the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution and to draw all reasonable inferences therefrom in the government’s favor.” United States v. Ashfield, 735 F. 2d 101, 106 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 858, 105 S.Ct. 189, 83 L.Ed.2d 122 (1984). Our review of the sufficiency of the evidence is equally deferential: "we must independently re-examine the record and determine as a matter of law whether the evidence could support an inference of guilt beyon…
• Davis v. Merrill Lynch, 906 F.2d 1206 (8th Cir. 1990)
  …tive damages should be awarded. We first note that Merrill Lynch bears the burden of proving that the South Dakota law governing punitive damages violates the due process clause. Fein v. United States, 730 F. 2d 1211, 1213 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 858, 105 S.Ct. 188, 83 L.Ed.2d 121 (1984). Although the Supreme Court has never reviewed punitive damages awards under the due process clause, Merrill Lynch may well be correct in arguing that such awards must satisfy the strictures of due process. To d…
• United States v. McGILL, 964 F.2d 222 (3d Cir. 1992)
  …utable to McGill had ceased. Our review of the sufficiency of the evidence is “governed by strict principles of deference to a jury’s findings.” United States v. Ashfield, 735 F. 2d 101, 106 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, sub nom. Storm v. United States, 469 U.S. 858, 105 S.Ct. 189, 83 L.Ed.2d 122 (1984). When a motion, for judgment of acquittal brought on a claim of insufficient evidence to support a conviction is denied, this court must sustain the verdict if “any rational trier of fact could have found the es…