HEIRENS

v.

IRVING, CHAIRMAN, ILLINOIS PRISON REVIEW BOARD, ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Langford, 802 F.2d 1176 (9th Cir. 1986)
  …F. 2d 1148 (9th Cir.1973). We should instead adopt the guidelines emerging from cases that actually consider this issue. See United States v. Downing, 753 F. 2d 1224 (3d Cir. 1985); United States v. Smith, 736 F. 2d 1103 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 868, 105 S.Ct. 213, 83 L.Ed.2d 143 (1984). I would vote to reverse Langford’s conviction because the district court abused its discretion by refusing to admit expert testimony regarding eyewitness unreliability. I. On January 15, 1985, a bank robber…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• United States v. Clay Dalton Johnson, 977 F.2d 1360 (10th Cir. 1992)
  …intended for distribution. Hooks, 780 F. 2d at 1532; see also United States v. Faymore, 736 F. 2d 328, 333 (6th Cir.) (“intent to distribute can be inferred by the jury from circumstantial evidence of possession of large quantities”), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 868, 105 S.Ct. 213, 83 L.Ed.2d 143 (1984). In this case, where a small, personal-sized container is found along with larger, commercial-sized containers, and where the defendant admits that he intended the smaller quantity for personal use only, the j…