JAMES M. HALL, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1968-11-12
No. 68-110
Before HENDRY and SWANN, JJ., and WHITE, JOSEPH S., Associate Judge.
215 So. 2d 496 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1968) Positive Treatment
Cited by 8 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks review of his conviction of the crime of robbery.

It is the appellant’s contention that the state failed to establish a prima facie case of robbery against him because the eye witness did not satisfactorily establish appellant’s identity as a participant in the crime.

We have carefully considered this contention in the light of the evidence appearing in the record and the controlling principles of law; we have concluded that appellant’s contention is without merit. In our opinion there is substantial competent evidence to support the conviction. Crum v. State, Fla.App.1965, 172 So.2d 24; Sharon v. State, Fla.App.1963, 156 So.2d 677.

Affirmed.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Marine Exploration Co., Inc. v. McCOY, 308 So. 2d 43 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975)
    …for the reasons stated, the judgment appealed is affirmed. Affirmed. . Steiger v. Massachusetts Casualty Insurance Co., Fla.App.1971, 253 So. 2d 882; Brevard County v. Apel, Fla.App.1971, 246 So. 2d 134; City of Hialeah v. Hutchins, Fla.App.1968, 215 So. 2d 496; Raydel, Ltd. v. Medcalfe, Fla.App.1964, 162 So. 2d 910, 915, rev’d on other grounds, Fla., 178 So. 2d 569; Tampa Transit Lines, Inc. v. Smith, Fla.App. 1963, 155 So. 2d 557.…
  • Vining v. Carmona, 596 So. 2d 154 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992)
    …findings. See McDonough Power Equipment Inc. v. Brown, 486 So. 2d 609 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986); Department of Transportation v. Hawkins Bridge Co., 457 So. 2d 525 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984), review denied, 467 So. 2d 999 (Fla.1985); City of Hialeah v. Hutchins, 215 So. 2d 496 (Fla. 3d DCA 1968); Roberts v. Bushore, 183 So. 2d 708 (Fla. 1st DCA 1966). Appellant’s second argument is also without merit. As the prevailing party at trial, appellant would only be entitled to recover his attorneys fees if such a recovery were…
  • Kapchuck v. Orlan, 332 So. 2d 671 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976)
    ….1969, 217 So. 2d 854. There being competent substantial medical testimony that Ms. Kapchuck sustained no [*673] permanent disability as a result of the accident, we will not disturb the jury’s verdict. See City of Hialeah v. Hutchins, Fla.App.1968, 215 So. 2d 496 and cases cited therein. Affirmed.…

Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw