EUBANK

v.

LEE LUMBER CO., LTD., ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (19 total)

• Green v. Mansour, 474 U.S. 64 (U.S. 1985)
  …th v. Wilson, 554 F. Supp. 539 (Vt. 1982), aff’d, 707 F. 2d 57 (CA2 1983) (per curiam), but it conflicts with the decisions in Appleyard v. Wallace, 754 F. 2d 955, 959-963 (CA11 1985); Randall v. Lukhard, 729 F. 2d 966 (CA4) (en banc), cert. denied, 469 U. S. 872 (1984); Beltran v. Myers, 701 F. 2d 91, 94 (CA9) (per curiam), cert. denied, 462 U. S. 1134 (1983); and Silva v. Vowell, 621 F. 2d 640, 650-654 (CA5 1980), which all allowed notice relief even though changes in state policy or federal law rendered m…
• United States v. The City OF Twin Falls, 806 F.2d 862 (9th Cir. 1986)
  …xtent of precluding recovery of legitimate and indispensible [sic] litigation expenditures.’ ” (quoting Roberts v. S.S. Kyriakoula D. Lemos, 651 F. 2d 201, 206 (3d Cir.1981)), rev’d on other grounds, 727 F. 2d 692 (8th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 872, 105 S.Ct. 222, 83 L.Ed.2d 152 (1984); Roberts, 651 F. 2d at 206 (“when the expert’s testimony ‘played a crucial role in the resolution of the issues presented,’ a district court, in its discretion, may award expert fees”); see also International Wo…
• Ad-Vantage Tel. Directory Consultants, Inc. v. GTE Directories Corp., 849 F.2d 1336 (11th Cir. 1987)
  …r v. Egypt News Company, Inc., 713 F. 2d 363 (8th Cir.1983). In these cases, the monopolist is seen as imposing a vertical restraint on intrabrand competition. See also Paschall v. Kansas City Star, 727 F. 2d 692, 698 (8th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 872, 105 S.Ct. 222, 83 L.Ed.2d 152 (legitimate business reasons for vertical integration will negate antitrust liability in the absence of “dirty tricks.”) However, the superficial similarity between this case and the vertical restraint cases cited abo…