THURMAN

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (41 total)

• Brown v. Trs. OF Boston Univ., 891 F.2d 337 (1st Cir. 1989)
  …A v. El Paso County Community College District, 730 F. 2d 258, 273-74 (5th Cir.) (citing Meyer v. Brown & Root Construction Co., 661 F. 2d 369, 374 (5th Cir.1981); Gregory v. Litton Systems, Inc., 472 F. 2d 631, 633-34 (9th Cir.1972)), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 881, 105 S.Ct. 248, 83 L.Ed.2d 186 (1984). But there is no such reason here for an injunction running to the benefit of nonparties. Professor Brown’s case established that she alone had been the victim of sex discrimination. The only permissible focus…
• United States v. Linn, 880 F.2d 209 (9th Cir. 1989)
  …regularly are. Fry was a “qualified witness,” even though she was not a computer programmer. See United States v. Miller, 771 F. 2d 1219, 1237 (9th Cir.1985); see also United States v. Young Bros., Inc., 728 F. 2d 682, 694 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 881, 105 S.Ct. 246, 83 L.Ed.2d 184 (1984). In any event, telephone records are business records for the purposes of Fed.R.Evid. 803(6). See, e.g., United States v. Vela, 673 F. 2d 86, 89-90 (5th Cir.1982). Since this court has given district courts bro…
• Rosario-Torres v. Hernandez-Colon, 889 F.2d 314 (1st Cir. 1989)
  …(1988). Attentive review of these and similar cases, see, e.g., Banks v. Burkich, 788 F. 2d 1161, 1164 (6th Cir. 1986); Professional Ass’n of College Educators v. El Paso County Community College Dist., 730 F. 2d 258, 269 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 881, 105 S.Ct. 248, 83 L.Ed.2d 186 (1984), persuades us that the “presumption” of reinstatement expressed therein is not a substantive rule of law, but merely an attempt at reformulation of the basic principle that, in determining appropriate relief on…