CHEMICAL BANK ET AL.

v.

ARTHUR ANDERSEN & CO.

Citator

Cited By (48 total)

• Stone v. State, 547 So. 2d 158 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989)
  …ot be read to supply a talisman for search incident to arrest. Two somewhat more recent court of appeals cases shed light on how Chadwick applies. In United States v. Hill, 730 F. 2d 1163 (8th Cir.), cert. denied sub nom., Frazier v. United States, 469 U.S. 884, 105 S.Ct. 255, 83 L.Ed.2d 192 (1984), Hill was unlawfully arrested in his home. Allegedly, after being escorted out of the house, he asked to return to his bedroom, and agreed to have an officer there with him. The officer testified at the suppress…
• United States v. Nunley, 873 F.2d 182 (8th Cir. 1989)
  …izure or detention, ... [since,] ‘in view of all the [*185] circumstances surrounding the incident, a reasonable person would have believed that [she] was not free to leave.’ ” United States v. Sadosky, 732 F. 2d 1388, 1392 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 884, 105 S.Ct. 254, 83 L.Ed.2d 191 (1984) (quoting United States v. Mendenhall, 446 U.S. 544, 554, 100 S.Ct. 1870, 1877, 64 L.Ed.2d 497 (1980)). Like the detainee in Sadosky, Nunley could reasonably believe that the agent’s statement indicated that thi…
• Schlifke v. Seafirst Corp. & Seattle-First Nat'l Bank, 866 F.2d 935 (7th Cir. 1989)
  …f scienter. The Bank has also challenged the 10b-5 claim for failing to establish that the enumerated omissions were made “in connection with the sale of securities,” see Chemical Bank v. Arthur Andersen & Co., 726 F. 2d 930 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 884, 105 S.Ct. 253, 83 L.Ed.2d 190 (1984), and on the grounds of non-materiality. In view of the failure of the allegations on the bases we .have noted above, we need not explore these additional arguments. D. Aiding and Abetting Liability under Sectio…