CITY OF CLEVELAND
v.
CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING CO.
CITY OF CLEVELAND
CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING CO.
469 U.S. 884
Supreme Court of the United States (1984)
Caution
Cited by 50 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (48 total)
-
Stone v. State, 547 So. 2d 158 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989)…ot be read to supply a talisman for search incident to arrest. Two somewhat more recent court of appeals cases shed light on how Chadwick applies. In United States v. Hill, 730 F. 2d 1163 (8th Cir.), cert. denied sub nom., Frazier v. United States, 469 U.S. 884, 105 S.Ct. 255, 83 L.Ed.2d 192 (1984), Hill was unlawfully arrested in his home. Allegedly, after being escorted out of the house, he asked to return to his bedroom, and agreed to have an officer there with him. The officer testified at the suppress…
-
Landreth Timber Co. v. Landreth, 471 U.S. 681 (U.S. 1985)
-
United States v. Nunley, 873 F.2d 182 (8th Cir. 1989)…izure or detention, ... [since,] ‘in view of all the [*185] circumstances surrounding the incident, a reasonable person would have believed that [she] was not free to leave.’ ” United States v. Sadosky, 732 F. 2d 1388, 1392 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 884, 105 S.Ct. 254, 83 L.Ed.2d 191 (1984) (quoting United States v. Mendenhall, 446 U.S. 544, 554, 100 S.Ct. 1870, 1877, 64 L.Ed.2d 497 (1980)). Like the detainee in Sadosky, Nunley could reasonably believe that the agent’s statement indicated that thi…
Previewing 3 of 48 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence