IN RE THE JOINT PETITION OF THE FLORIDA BAR AND RAYMOND, JAMES AND ASSOCIATES, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION

Fla. | 1968-11-06
No. 37819
CALDWELL, C. J., and DREW, THOR-NAL, ERVIN and HOPPING, JJ., concur.
215 So. 2d 613 Florida Supreme Court (1968) Caution
Cited by 20 cases

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

The Florida Supreme Court approved a joint petition from The Florida Bar and Raymond, James and Associates, Inc. defining the scope of permissible activities for securities brokers to avoid unauthorized practice of law. The court issued a comprehensive decree delineating which estate planning, tax, and financial advisory activities constitute unauthorized legal practice and which activities brokers may lawfully perform.


Holding

The court held that securities brokers are prohibited from giving legal advice regarding wills, trusts, estate planning, joint property ownership, and related legal matters, but may perform specified routine services incidental to securities transactions, complete standardized forms, discuss general financial and tax principles, and cooperate with customers' attorneys on estate planning matters.


Key Quotes

“The following activities constitute the unauthorized practice of law and may not be carried on by Raymond, James and Associates, Inc., its individual officers, agents or employees and each of them is perpetually restrained and enjoined from: (1) Giving legal advice, directly or indirectly to individuals or groups concerning the application, preparation, advisability or quality of any legal instrument or document or forms thereof in connection with the disposition of property inter vivos or upon death, including inter vivos trusts and wills.”

Establishes the core prohibition against legal advice on estate planning matters by non-lawyers

Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

Raymond, James and Associates, Inc. is a Florida securities broker that engaged in various financial advisory activities. The Florida Bar and the corp…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

This cause coming before the Court presents the question whether certain activities of a securities broker constitute the unauthorized practice of law, and it appearing from the joint petition signed by the parties that petitioners, The Florida Bar and Raymond, James and Associates, Inc., a Florida corporation, have consented to this decree to clarify and remove any existing areas of disagreement which may have arisen between them, and the parties having agreed that the procedural provisions of Sub-sections 4 through 8, inclusive, of Article XVI of the Integration Rule of The Florida Bar, 32 F.S.A. be waived and that the joint petition be entertained, and the Court having jurisdiction of this matter, it is hereby

Ordered, adjudged and decreed as follows :

1. The following activities constitute the unauthorized practice of law and may not be carried on by Raymond, James and Associates, Inc., its individual officers, agents or employees and each of them is perpetually restrained and enjoined from:

(1) Giving legal advice, directly or indirectly to individuals or groups concerning the application, preparation, advis*614ability or quality of any legal instrument or document or forms thereof in connection with the disposition of property inter vivos or upon death, including inter vivos trusts and wills.
(2) Advertising that they will give any legal advice concerning the form or manner of ownership of property applicable either while the individual is living or upon death, or concerning the planning of an estate and disposition of property either inter vivos or upon death.
(3) Giving legal advice, directly or indirectly to individuals or groups concerning the legal consequences of joint ownership of property and holding out-of-state assets, or concerning the effect of the statutes, laws or court decisions of Florida or any other jurisdiction upon one who is no longer able to manage his own affairs.
(4) Advising, directly or indirectly, an individual or individuals concerning the quality or advisability of the use of various devices for disposing of his or their property upon death.
(5) Holding, sponsoring or appearing as a participant at meetings, seminars or group gatherings for the purpose of discussing the legal aspects of retirement planning, joint ownership of property, out-of-state assets, wills and trusts.
(6) Offering, directly or indirectly, to give legal advice or render legal services to the public and inviting the public, either directly or by implication in advertising, to bring any legal problem to them for advice.
(7) Offering estate analysis services which involve providing specific legal information in relation to specific facts of a particular person’s estate.

2. Raymond, James and Associates, Inc., its officers, agents and employees properly may, as long as it does not violate any of the foregoing provisions:

(1)Solicit specific facts about customers’ or prospective customers’ assets.
(2) When acting as a securities broker, securities dealer, securities salesman or investment counsel licensed under the state or federal law (i) complete or aid in the completion of simple, routine forms relating to the transfer or ownership of shares of stock and other securities, including mutual fund shares; (ii) complete or aid in the completion of simple, printed withdrawal and re-investment olans supplied by mutual fund companies; (iii) complete or aid in the completion of simple printed forms supplied by mutual fund companies which provide for accumulation or payment of funds during minority when no successor beneficiary or future interest is involved; (iv) other similar simple, routine forms which are incidental to the Corporation’s sale, purchase or transfer of securities; and (v) complete or aid in the completion of standardized printed forms relating to the so-calle4 “Keogh” self-employed retirement plans provided such forms are supplied by institutional trustees or custodians, or by life insurance or mutual fund companies and are prototype forms approved by the Internal Revenue Service and provided further that the third person is notified that legal and tax consequences in such plans vary in particulai cases and the third person should consult his attorney.
(3) Without purporting to determine specific tax liability, discuss and project possible income and gift tax effects from the sale, purchase, transfer or ownership of investments.
(4) Assist with specific factual information needed by customers or prospective customers for the preparation of tax returns, local, state or federal.
(5) Discuss with customers or prospective customers the common and usual methods of registration of ownership of securities.
(6) Confer with attorneys of customers or attorneys of prospective customers con*615cerning the manner of registration of ownership of investments for clients.
(7) Assist the attorneys of customers or attorneys of prospective customers in planning the disposition of the client’s estate specifically, and carry out the attorneys’ instructions relative to those plans.
(8) Discuss with customers or prospective customers, in general, federal and local estate and inheritance taxes, unrelated to the specific tax liability of the customer or • prospective customer.
(9) Lecture before groups on the subject of finance, investments, economics, general principles of taxation and common and usual methods of ownership of investments.
(10) ■ Discuss general principles of law in a general manner without applying, directly or indirectly, such general principles to a factual situation.
(11) Discuss the securities investment aspects of self-employed and corporate profit-sharing and pension plans.
(12)Advertise to the public the Corporation’s services relative to individual financial analysis, including general tax considerations of investments.

The Corporation has cooperated in seeking the determination made herein and there is nothing to indicate that it has deliberately or contemptuously violated that part of the Integration Rule prohibiting the unauthorized practice of law.

No proceeding for contempt for violation of this decree shall be instituted by The Florida Bar unless Raymond, James and Associates, Inc. shall have been given thirty days’ written notice by The Florida Bar of its intention to institute such proceedings, within which thirty-day period of time, Raymond, James and Associates, Inc. may discontinue the acts, omissions or course of conduct and thereby purge itself of the alleged contempt, provided there be no repetition of such acts, omissions or course of conduct.

It is so ordered.

CALDWELL, C. J., and DREW, THOR-NAL, ERVIN and HOPPING, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • State v. Garcia, 240 So. 2d 633 (Fla. 1970)
    …(3d Dist.Ct.App.Fla.1969). . Roman v. State, 226 So. 2d 19 (3d Dist.Ct.App.Fla.1969); and Stetzler v. State, 226 So. 2d 18 (3d Dist.Ct.App.Fla.1969). . Garcia v. State, 226 So. 2d 17, 18 (3d Dist.Ct.App.Fla.1969). . 199 So. 2d 276 (Fla.1967). . 215 So. 2d 613 (Fla.1968). . 222 So. 2d 228 (4th Dist.Ct.App.Fla.1969).…
  • …chapter 119, Florida Statutes. Jurisdiction is predicated on the Court’s inherent and exclusive constitutional authority over its agencies who act in its behalf. In Re Florida Board of Bar Examiners, 278 So. 2d 266 (Fla.1973); In Re The Florida Bar, 215 So. 2d 613 (Fla. 1968). In Re Florida Board of Bar Examiners, 353 So. 2d 98 (Fla.1977), was an advisory opinion concerning a statute requiring state agencies to adapt their entrance or qualifying examinations to accommodate individuals who are blind or deaf. E…
  • …r must make the determination as to the client’s need for a living trust and identify the type of living trust most appro [*428] priate for the client. As this Court stated in In re Joint Petition of The Florida Bar & Raymond, James & Assocs., Inc., 215 So. 2d 613, 613-14 (Fla.1968), “[gjiving legal advice ... concerning the application, preparation, advisability or quality of any legal instrument or document or forms thereof in connection with the disposition of property inter vivos or upon death” constitute…

Previewing 3 of 10 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw