GREAT ATLANTIC & PACIFIC TEA CO., INC.

v.

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Citator

Cited By

• In re Amendments TO Rules Regulating THE Fla. Bar-1-3.1(a) & Rules OF Jud. Administration-2.065 (Legal AID), 573 So. 2d 800 (Fla. 1990)
  …tioners direct this Court’s attention to its acknowledgment of its responsibility to assure the availability of legal representation to the poor as contained in our decisions in The Florida Bar v. Furman, 376 So. 2d 378 (Fla.1979), appeal dismissed, 469 U.S. 925, 105 S.Ct. 316, 83 L.Ed.2d 254 (1984), and The Florida Bar: In re Emergency Delivery of Legal Services to the Poor, 432 So. 2d 39 (Fla.1983), as well as in In Interest of D.B., 385 So. 2d 83 (Fla.1980), where we explained the historic obligation of…
• Hicks v. The Gates Rubber Co., 833 F.2d 1406 (10th Cir. 1987)
  …until the charges’ final disposition. See EEOC v. [*1419] Shell Oil Co., 466 U.S. 54, 78 and n. 35, 104 S.Ct. 1621, 1636 and n. 35, 80 L.Ed.2d 41 (1984); EEOC v. The Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., 735 F. 2d 69, 72, 74 (3d Cir.), cert. dismissed, 469 U.S. 925, 105 S.Ct. 307, 83 L.Ed.2d 241 (1984). Gates acknowledges that many of the clock charts and daily reports generated by the plaintiff and other security guards were destroyed pursuant to its routine business practices. Gates, however, argues that th…
• Luby v. Teamsters Health, 944 F.2d 1176 (3d Cir. 1991)
  …remedy. If the district court did not err in its legal conclusions, our review of the district court’s assessment of the equities is for abuse of discretion. See EEOC v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., 735 F. 2d 69, 81 (3d Cir.), cert. dismissed, 469 U.S. 925, 105 S.Ct. 307, 83 L.Ed.2d 241 (1984). Although ERISA itself does not explicitly provide a statutory right of restitution, it is clear that Congress intended federal courts to fashion a federal common-law under ERISA, and this permits application o…