GARY

v.

CALIFORNIA

Citator

Cited By (29 total)

• United States v. Azure, 801 F.2d 336 (8th Cir. 1986)
  …issue....” The [*340] decision whether to permit expert testimony ordinarily lies within the discretion of the trial court and will not be reversed absent an abuse of discretion. United States v. Rose, 731 F. 2d 1337, 1345 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 931, 105 S.Ct. 326, 83 L.Ed.2d 263 (1984). Research has not revealed any federal cases addressing this particular issue, but some circuits have addressed the question of the admissibility of expert opinion testimony on credibility in general. In United…
• United States v. Miller, 821 F.2d 546 (11th Cir. 1987)
  …); United States v. Griffin, 729 F. 2d 475, 483 (7th Cir.) (car borrowed from brother), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 830, 105 S.Ct. 117, 83 L.Ed.2d 60 (1984); United States v. Rose, 731 F. 2d 1337, 1343 (8th Cir.) (car borrowed from sister), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 931, 105 S.Ct. 326, 83 L.Ed.2d 263 (1984). B. Whether the initial stop of the appellant’s car was legitimate. On appeal, the government argues that the initial stop of the appellant’s car was a legitimate traffic stop. As the government has acknowledg…
• United States v. Judd Carver Eisenberg, 807 F.2d 1446 (8th Cir. 1986)
  …y the more stringent probable cause analysis. “An action tantamount to arrest has taken place if the officers’ conduct is more intrusive than necessary for an investigative stop.” United States v. Rose, 731 F. 2d 1337, 1342 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 931, 105 S.Ct. 326, 83 L.Ed.2d 263 (1984). The officers may take such steps as are “ ‘reasonably necessary to protect their personal safety and to maintain the status quo’ so that the limited purpose of the stop may be achieved.” United States v. Jones,…