GIGLIO

v.

DUNN ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Jones v. Berry, 880 F.2d 670 (2d Cir. 1989)
  …ck on Thomas’ credibility, it cannot be said that there was a “reasonable possibility” that the exclusion of this evidence affected the outcome of the trial (see, People v. Malizia, 62 NY2d 755, 757, [476 N.Y.S.2d 825, 465 N.E. 2d 364], cert. denied 469 US 932 [105 S.Ct. 327, 83 L.Ed.2d 264]; People v. Crimmins, 36 NY2d 230, 237 [367 N.Y.S.2d 213, 326 N.E. 2d 787]). Finally, the record discloses that the defendant’s guilt was proven beyond a reasonable doubt. People v. Jones, 125 A.D.2d 414, 414-15, 509…
• Sec. & Exch. Comm'n v. Simpson, 885 F.2d 390 (7th Cir. 1989)
  …ompelling reason for an immediate remedy’ or time is of the essence.” Moschiano, 695 F. 2d at 251 (emphasis supplied); see also In re Jafree, 741 F. 2d 133, 135 (7th Cir.1984); United States v. Lowery, 733 F. 2d 441, 446-48 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 932, 105 S.Ct. 327, 83 L.Ed.2d 264 (1984). When no compelling reason for an immediate remedy is evident or time is not of the essence, the conduct in issue is indirect contempt — “the exclusive remedy for which is provided by Rule 42(b).” In re Jafree…
• Ymca OF THE Pikes Peak Region, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 914 F.2d 1442 (10th Cir. 1990)
  …at 1512 n. 10. Action on behalf of an individual grievance also may constitute concerted activity. See Intermountain Rural Elec. Ass’n v. NLRB, 732 F. 2d 754, 763 (10th Cir.) (employee argued with employer on behalf of fellow worker), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 932, 105 S.Ct. 327, 83 L.Ed.2d 264 (1984). As Judge Learned Hand explained, the act of association, rather than the object of association, forms the basis of Section 7’s protections: When all the other workmen in a shop make common cause with a fellow…