ORTHO PHARMACEUTICAL CORP.

v.

WOODERSON

Citator

Cited By

• Brown v. State, 526 So. 2d 903 (Fla. 1988)
  …ty. In a novel challenge, appellant does not complain about the jury selection process or the voter registration list from which prospective jurors are drawn, see, e.g., People v. Harris, 36 Cal.3d 36, 201 Cal.Rptr. 782, 679 P. 2d 433, cert. denied, 469 U.S. 965, 105 S.Ct. 365, 83 L.Ed.2d 301 (1984), but contends rather that moving the case to Bay County resulted in a systematic exclusion of blacks because only eight percent of those eligible for jury duty in Bay County were black compared to twenty-two per…
• United States v. Epifanio Sanchez-Lopez, 879 F.2d 541 (9th Cir. 1989)
  …for election of counts because Counts I and III of the indictment were multiplicious. "We review the denial of a motion to require an election of counts for abuse of discretion.” United States v. Kennedy, 726 F. 2d 546, 547 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 965, 105 S.Ct. 365, 83 L.Ed.2d 301 (1984). Count I of the indictment charged appellants with conspiracy to distribute 500 grams of cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 846. Count III charged appellants with a conspiracy to distribute 100…
• United States v. Gonzalez, 933 F.2d 417 (7th Cir. 1991)
  …in evaluating whether counts are multiplicitous: “The traditional test of multiplicity ‘determines whether each count “requires proof of a fact which the other does not.” ’ United States v. Kennedy, 726 F. 2d 546, 547-48 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, [469 U.S. 965], 105 S.Ct. 365, 83 L.Ed.2d 301 (1984) (quoting United States v. Glanton, 707 F. 2d 1238 (11th Cir.1983)). ‘If one element is required to prove the offense in one count which is not required to prove the offense in the second count, there is no mult…