ENRIGHT ET AL.

v.

BOARD OF SCHOOL DIRECTORS OF THE CITY OF MILWAUKEE ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (17 total)

• Smith v. State, 641 So. 2d 1319 (Fla. 1994)
  …ompetence. Further, Smith’s letter did not contain an explicit assertion of his right to self-representation, so a Faretta4 inquiry was not required. Raulerson v. Wainwright, 732 F. 2d 803, 808 (11th Cir.), 736 F. 2d 1528 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 966, 105 S.Ct. 366, 83 L.Ed.2d 302 (1984). Thus, the trial court was not obliged to inform Smith of this right and to determine whether he knowingly and intelligently chose to waive his right to counsel. We find no error on this issue. The second issue…
• King Brooks v. State, 703 So. 2d 504 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997)
  …S.Ct. 3517, 82 L.Ed.2d 825 (1984). The Eleventh Circuit has held that a defendant’s election to act as co-counsel may waive any earlier asserted rights of self-representation. Raulerson v. Wainwright, 732 F. 2d 803, 809 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 966, 105 S.Ct. 366, 83 L.Ed.2d 302 (1984). In the case at hand, however, it is not necessary to address whether or not the defendant’s request to act as co-counsel waived any earlier asserted right of self-representation because Brooks never asserted…
• United States v. Teague, 953 F.2d 1525 (11th Cir. 1992)
  …pro se, followed by in-court renewal of the request, was a sufficient invocation of the right, defendant’s conduct in walking out of the courtroom during the Faretta inquiry rendered the request either equivocal or effectively waived), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 966, 105 S.Ct. 366, 83 L.Ed.2d 302 (1984); Brown, 665 F. 2d at 611 (although defendant’s counsel filed a pretrial motion stating that defendant waived his right to counsel, defendant actually waived his right to self-representation by virtue of his coop…