JOHNSON

v.

MARYLAND

Citator

Cited By (11 total)

• Williams v. A.L. Lockhart, 862 F.2d 155 (8th Cir. 1988)
  …and sentenced to life imprisonment. His convictions were affirmed by the Arkansas Supreme Court. Williams v. State, 281 Ark. 91, 663 S.W. 2d 700 (1983), supplemental opinion issued on denial of rehearing, 281 Ark. 97, 663 S.W. 2d 703, cert. denied, 469 U.S. 980, 105 S.Ct. 382, 83 L.Ed.2d 317 (1984). In 1985, Williams’s trial attorney, Larry P. Vaught, filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus on Williams’s behalf in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas. This petition al…
• Igor Lifshitz v. Walter Drake & Sons, Inc., 806 F.2d 1426 (9th Cir. 1986)
  …gement claims. “[W]e view the evidence in a light most favorable to [Lifshitz and determine whether there exists] substantial evidence to support the jury’s verdict.” Garter-Bare Co. v. Munsingwear, Inc., 723 F. 2d 707, 709 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 980, 105 S.Ct. 381, 83 L.Ed.2d 316 (1984). To the extent the disposition of the motion turned upon mixed questions of law and fact, our review is de novo. See United States v. McConney, 728 F. 2d 1195 (9th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 824, 10…
• Millard v. Lynaugh, 810 F.2d 1403 (5th Cir. 1987)
  …old consideration in applying the Barker test is whether the delay is of sufficient length to be deemed “presumptively prejudicial, thus requiring an inquiry into the other Barker factors.” Gray v. King, 724 F. 2d 1199, 1202 (5th Cir.) cert. denied, 469 U.S. 980, 105 S.Ct. 381, 83 L.Ed.2d 316 (1984). Because the present eighteen month delay falls within the range of delay considered “presumptively prejudicial” in this Circuit,1 consideration of the three remaining Barker factors is appropriate. Considerati…