SCHAPANSKY
v.
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION; ADAMS ET AL. V. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION; MARTEL V. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION; MOYLAN V. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION; DORRANCE V. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION; DIMASSO V. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION; AND ANDERSON ET AL. V. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ET AL.

U.S. | 1984-11-13
Nos. 84-258; No. 84-259
469 U.S. 1018 Supreme Court of the United States (1984) Negative Treatment
Cited by 62 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By (58 total)

  • Finley v. United States, 490 U.S. 545 (U.S. 1989)
    …sed jurisdiction, pendent to the claim against the Government [*570] under the FTCA over which the federal court has exclusive jurisdiction.” Stewart v. United States, 716 F. 2d 755, 757-759 (CA10 1982) (footnote and citation omitted), cert. denied, 469 U. S. 1018 (1984). In Lykins v. Pointer, Inc., 725 F. 2d 645 (CA11 1984), another Court of Appeals reached the same conclusion: “Turning first to a consideration of 28 U. S. C. § 1346(b), the statute granting federal jurisdiction over plaintiff’s tort claim…
    1 / 2
  • Aubie Baltin v. Alaron Trading Corp., 128 F.3d 1466 (11th Cir. 1997)
    …io, 717 F.Supp. 822, 824 (S.D.Fla.1989); Higgins v. United States Postal Serv., 655 F.Supp. 739, 741 (D.Me.1987); Hughes-Bechtol, Inc. v. W. Va. Bd. of Regents, 527 F.Supp. 1366, 1384 (S.D.Ohio 1981), aff'd, 737 F. 2d 540 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1018, 105 S.Ct. 433, 83 L.Ed.2d 359 (1984); Paley Assocs., Inc. v. Universal Woolens, Inc., 446 F.Supp. 212, 213 n. 1 (S.D.N.Y.1978); Litton RCS, Inc. v. Pa. Turnpike Comm'n, 376 F.Supp. 579 (E.D.Pa.1974), aff'd, 511 F. 2d 1394 (3d Cir. 1975); Bangor & A…
  • Atl. Richfield Co. v. USA Petroleum Co., 495 U.S. 328 (U.S. 1990)
    …e Indiana Grocery, Inc. v. Super Valu Stores, Inc., 864 F. 2d 1409, 1418-1420 (1989); Local Beauty Supply, Inc. v. Lamaur, Inc., 787 F. 2d 1197, 1201-1203 (1986); Jack Walters & Sons Corp. v. Morton Bldg., Inc., 737 F. 2d 698, 708-709, cert. denied, 469 U. S. 1018 (1984). We assume, arguendo, that Albrecht correctly held that vertical, maximum price fixing is subject to the per se rule. Albrecht is the only case in which the Court has confronted an unadulterated vertical, maximum-price-fixing arrangement. I…

Previewing 3 of 58 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw