HEMINGWAY, ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF HEMINGWAY
v.
OCHSNER CLINIC ET AL.; PHINNEY V. FIRST AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK; ZOLLA V. UNITED STATES; BUTLER V. FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION; WASHBURN V. WASHBURN; DOMINEY V. ATCHISON, TOPEKA & SANTA FE RAILWAY CO.; ANGLETON ET AL. V. PIERCE, SECRETARY OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, ET AL.; SKILLERN V. PROCUNIER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; ROY ET AL. V. CITY OF MIDDLETOWN; THOMAS V. GERBER PRODUCTIONS ET AL.; SILAGY V. ILLINOIS; WESSON V. COUGHLIN; JONES V. FRANCIS, WARDEN; BAIG V. UNITED STATES; ROBERTS V. GEORGIA; FAISON V. FLORIDA ET AL.; BROWN V. FLURE ET AL.; NOVEL V. PICARIELLO ET AL.; POLIN ET UX. V. JEWS FOR JESUS ET AL.; PERRY V. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA; SMITH V. CHATTANOOGA-HAMILTON COUNTY HOSPITAL ET AL.; STROOM V. CARTER, FORMER PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, ET AL.; FELKER V. GEORGIA; CAITO V. INDIANA; CHETISTER V. CHETISTER; INGRAM V. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF ILLINOIS ET AL.; SHAW V. MARTIN, WARDEN; GUMZ ET AL. V. PIONEER NURSING HOME ET AL.
HEMINGWAY, ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF HEMINGWAY
OCHSNER CLINIC ET AL.; PHINNEY V. FIRST AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK; ZOLLA V. UNITED STATES; BUTLER V. FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION; WASHBURN V. WASHBURN; DOMINEY V. ATCHISON, TOPEKA & SANTA FE RAILWAY CO.; ANGLETON ET AL. V. PIERCE, SECRETARY OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, ET AL.; SKILLERN V. PROCUNIER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; ROY ET AL. V. CITY OF MIDDLETOWN; THOMAS V. GERBER PRODUCTIONS ET AL.; SILAGY V. ILLINOIS; WESSON V. COUGHLIN; JONES V. FRANCIS, WARDEN; BAIG V. UNITED STATES; ROBERTS V. GEORGIA; FAISON V. FLORIDA ET AL.; BROWN V. FLURE ET AL.; NOVEL V. PICARIELLO ET AL.; POLIN ET UX. V. JEWS FOR JESUS ET AL.; PERRY V. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA; SMITH V. CHATTANOOGA-HAMILTON COUNTY HOSPITAL ET AL.; STROOM V. CARTER, FORMER PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, ET AL.; FELKER V. GEORGIA; CAITO V. INDIANA; CHETISTER V. CHETISTER; INGRAM V. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF ILLINOIS ET AL.; SHAW V. MARTIN, WARDEN; GUMZ ET AL. V. PIONEER NURSING HOME ET AL.
469 U.S. 1067
Supreme Court of the United States (1984)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 6 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Hamblen v. State, 527 So. 2d 800 (Fla. 1988)…appeals affirmed. The United States Supreme Court denied an application for stay of execution. Lenhard v. Wolff, 444 U.S. 807, 100 S.Ct. 29, 62 L.Ed.2d 20 (1979). In People v. Silagy, 101 Ill.2d 147, 77 Ill.Dec. 792, 461 N.E. 2d 415, cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1067, 105 S.Ct. 552, 83 L.Ed.2d 439 (1984), the defendant made a voluntary election to represent himself in the penalty phase after the jury had entered a finding of guilt. In rejecting appointed counsel’s contention that the waiver of counsel frustrated…
-
Tison v. Arizona, 481 U.S. 137 (U.S. 1987)…that theory), cert. denied, 469 U. S. 1098 (1984); Skillern v. Estelle, 720 F. 2d 839, 844 (CA5 1983) (evidence supports finding that Skillern agreed and “plotted in advance” to kill the eventual victim), cert, denied sub nom. Skillern v. Procunier, 469 U. S. 1067 (1984). See Amnesty International, swpra, at 192 (listing death row totals by State as of Oct. 1986). The cases since Enmund in which the Arizona Supreme Court has rejected the defendant’s Enmund challenge and affirmed the death sentence are: Sta…
-
Porretto v. Stalder, 834 F.2d 461 (5th Cir. 1987)…magnitude as to constitute a denial of fundamental fairness under the due process clause.” Skillern v. Estelle, 720 F. 2d 839, 852 (5th Cir.1983), reh’g denied, 724 F. 2d 127, cert. denied, 469 U.S. 873, 105 S.Ct. 224, 83 L.Ed.2d 153, reh ’g denied, 469 U.S. 1067, 105 S.Ct. 551, 83 L.Ed.2d 438 (1984); see also Dillard v. Blackburn, 780 F. 2d 509, 513 (5th Cir.1986). Erroneous exclusion of evidence is fundamentally unfair if the evidence was material in the sense that it was crucial, critical, and highly sign…