WHEELING PITTSBURGH STEEL CORP.

v.

DUFFY

Citator

Cited By (37 total)

• ST. Mary's Honor Ctr. v. Hicks, 509 U.S. 502 (U.S. 1993)
  …. 2d 315, 320 (CA6) (same), cert. [*513] denied, 484 U. S. 924 (1987); King v. Palmer, 250 U. S. App. D. C. 257, 260, 778 F. 2d 878, 881 (1985) (same); Duffy v. Wheeling Pittsburgh Steel Corp., 738 F. 2d 1393, 1395-1396 (CA3) (same), cert. denied, 469 U. S. 1087 (1984); Lopez v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co., 930 F. 2d 157, 161 (CA2) (same) (dictum), cert. denied, 502 U. S. 880 (1991); Caban-Wheeler v. Elsea, 904 F. 2d 1549, 1554 (CA11 1990) (same) (dictum); Thornbrough v. Columbus & Greenville R. Co., 760 F.…
• Chipollini v. Spencer Gifts, Inc., 814 F.2d 893 (3d Cir. 1987)
  …[*897] Under the ADEA, the ultimate burden remains with the plaintiff to prove that age was a determinative factor in the defendant employer’s decision. See e.g. Duffy v. Wheeling Pittsburgh Steel Corp., 738 F. 2d 1393, 1395 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1087, 105 S.Ct. 592, 83 L.Ed.2d 702 (1984). The plaintiff need not prove that age was the employer’s sole or exclusive consideration, but must prove that age made a difference in the decision. Id. A plaintiff may establish his case with direct evidence t…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Dreyer v. Arco Chem. Co., 801 F.2d 651 (3d Cir. 1986)
  …terminative factor” in the decision. See [*654] Texas Department of Community Affairs v. Burdine, 450 U.S. 248, 256, 101 S.Ct. 1089, 1095, 67 L.Ed.2d 207 (1981); Duffy v. Wheeling Pittsburgh Steel Corp., 738 F. 2d 1393, 1395 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1087,105 S.Ct. 592, 83 L.Ed.2d 702 (1984). In an age discrimination case, in order to make out a prima facie case: a plaintiff must prove that he (1) was discharged; (2) was qualified for the position; (3) was within the protected class at the time of…

  ← 1 / 2 →