BONIN

v.

AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC., ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Arango, 853 F.2d 818 (11th Cir. 1988)
  …o actually participated in the warrantless entry because extrinsic evidence is not admissible for the purpose of attacking credibility. Fed.R.Evid. 608(b); United States v. DiMatteo, 716 F. 2d 1361, 1365-67 (11th Cir.1983), vacated on other grounds, 469 U.S. 1101, 105 S.Ct. 769, 83 L.Ed.2d 767, on remand, 759 F. 2d 831 (11th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 860, 106 S.Ct. 172, 88 L.Ed.2d 143 (1985). E. Government Misconduct The last argument raised by the appellants is that considering the totality of the…
• United States v. Blake, 941 F.2d 334 (5th Cir. 1991)
  …aching the witness’ testimony (i.e. undermining his credibility), but for the purpose of proving the truth of the contradicted, material fact. United States v. DiMatteo, 716 F. 2d 1361, 1366 (11th Cir.1983) (citing Opager), vacated on other grounds, 469 U.S. 1101, 105 S.Ct. 769, 83 L.Ed.2d 767 (1985). Of course, the contradiction of fact itself does not make the issue material; the issue is either material or collateral, independent of the contradiction. As the D.C. Circuit has observed: “[t]he commonly us…
• Jasbir K. Kasuri v. ST. Elizabeth Hosp. Med. Ctr., 897 F.2d 845 (6th Cir. 1990)
  …608(b). She argues that the deposition constitutes extrinsic evidence of specific instances of conduct and is therefore inadmissible. In [*854] support of this assertion, she cites United States v. DiMatteo, 716 F. 2d 1361 (11th Cir.1983), vacated, 469 U.S. 1101, 105 S.Ct. 769, 83 L.Ed.2d 767 (1985). In DiMatteo, the Eleventh Circuit held that the testimony of a government agent as to whether marijuana was discussed at a meeting with the defendant was inadmissible under Rule 608(b). Such testimony was extri…