NORTHEAST BANCORP, INC., ET AL.

v.

BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (30 total)

• United States v. Nat'l Bank of Commerce, 472 U.S. 713 (U.S. 1985)
  …eclose its lien under Section 7403,” joining the codeposi-tors as defendants. Ibid. Because the opinion of the Court of Appeals appeared to us to conflict, directly or in principle, with decisions of other Courts of Appeals,6 we granted certiorari. 469 U. S. 1105 (1985). II A Section 6321 of the Code, 26 U. S. C. §6321, provides: “If any person liable to pay any tax neglects or refuses to pay the same after demand, the amount . . . shall be a lien in favor of the United States upon all property and rights…
• Bateman Eichler v. Berner, 472 U.S. 299 (U.S. 1985)
  …other than an outright preclusion of suit to deter tippees from trading on inside information. Id., at 1324, n. 3. The lower courts have divided over the proper scope of the in pari delicto defense in securities litigation.10 We granted certiorari. 469 U. S. 1105 (1985). We affirm. [*306] 1 — I HH The common-law defense at issue in this case derives from the Latin, in pari delicto potior est conditio defendentis: “In a case of equal or mutual fault. . . the position of the [defending] party ... is the bette…
• United States v. Espinoza-Seanez, 862 F.2d 526 (5th Cir. 1988)
  …Becer-ra’s conviction is stronger than that which exists in any of the four cases in which the majority relies. See United States v. Gardea Carrasco, 830 F. 2d 41 (5th Cir.1987); United States v. Blessing, 727 F. 2d 353 (5th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1105, 105 S.Ct. 777, 83 L.Ed.2d 773 (1985); United States v. Sneed, 705 F. 2d 745 (5th Cir.1983); United States v. Jackson, 700 F. 2d 181 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 842, 104 S.Ct. 139, 78 L.Ed.2d 132 (1983). Of these four authorities, United St…

  ← 1 / 2 →