TEXAS FARM BUREAU

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (49 total)

• State v. Bolyea, 520 So. 2d 562 (Fla. 1988)
  …ficient “custody” to enable [appellant] to seek relief under § 2255. The remedy under that section is as broad as it is under habeas corpus. (Citations omitted.) Accord Wright v. United States, 732 F. 2d 1048, 1050 n. 1 (2d Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1106, 105 S.Ct. 779, 83 L.Ed.2d 774 (1985); United States v. Condit, 621 F. 2d 1096, 1098 (10th Cir.1980); United States v. Loschiavo, 531 F. 2d 659, 662 (2d Cir.1976); Ohrynowicz v. United States, 542 F. 2d 715, 717 n. 8 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.…
• Missouri v. Jenkins, 491 U.S. 274 (U.S. 1989)
  …cost-effective delivery of legal services and, by reducing the spiraling cost of civil rights litigation, furthers the policies underlying civil rights statutes.” Cameo Convalescent Center, Inc. v. Senn, 738 F. 2d 836, 846 (CA7 1984), cert. denied, 469 U. S. 1106 (1985).10 [*289] Such separate billing appears to be the practice in most communities today.11 In the present case, Missouri concedes that “the local market typically bills separately for paralegal services,” Tr. of Oral Arg. 14, and the District Co…
• Morgan v. Illinois, 504 U.S. 719 (U.S. 1992)
  …sentencing by permitting the people to elect (or the executive to appoint) judges who favor the death penalty. Cf. United States v. Grinnell Corp., 384 U. S. 563, 583 (1966); United States v. Richards, 737 F. 2d 1307, 1311 (CA4 1984), cert. denied, 469 U. S. 1106 (1985); United States v. Thompson, 483 F. 2d 527, 530-531 (CA3 1973) (Adams, J., dissenting); 2 W. LaFave & J. Israel, Criminal Procedure § 21.4(b), p. 747 (1984) (adherence to a particular legal principle is not a basis for challenging impartiality…