THAPER

v.

NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Munoz v. State, 629 So. 2d 90 (Fla. 1993)
  …one of its agents. We expressly noted that “defendants cannot raise ‘due process violations allegedly suffered by third parties.’ ” 586 So. 2d at 322 (quoting United States v. Valdovinos-Valdovinos, 743 F. 2d 1436, 1437 (9th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1114, 105 S.Ct. 799, 83 L.Ed.2d 791 (1985)). Finally, we addressed section 777.201 in Herrera v. State, 594 So. 2d 275 (Fla.1992). In that case, defendant Herrera, as a result of a sting operation, was charged with trafficking in cocaine, conspiracy to…
• State v. Hunter, 586 So. 2d 319 (Fla. 1991)
  …nter, therefore, should not have been allowed to raise entrapment. Also, defendants cannot raise “due process violations allegedly suffered by third parties.” United States v. Valdovinos-Valdovinos, 743 F. 2d 1436, 1437 (9th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1114, 105 S.Ct. 799, 83 L.Ed.2d 791 (1985); accord United States v. Payner, 447 U.S. 727, 100 S.Ct. 2439, 65 L.Ed.2d 468 (1980); Hampton v. United States, 425 U.S. 484, 96 S.Ct. 1646, 48 L.Ed.2d 113 (1976). Thus, Hunter’s outrageous conduct/due process c…
• United States v. Morales-Quinones, 812 F.2d 604 (10th Cir. 1987)
  …646, 1651 n. 2, 48 L.Ed.2d 113 (1976) (Powell, J., concurring, joined by Blackmun, J.), relying particularly on United States v. Valdovinos-Valdovinos, 588 F.Supp. 551 (N.D.Cal.), rev’d on other grounds, 743 F. 2d 1436 (9th Cir. 1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1114, 105 S.Ct. 799, 83 L.Ed.2d 791 (1985). We are not persuaded by the Valdovinos opinion. There was some difference and an element not present here — the INS agents told the aliens that they were prospective employers. We are not convinced that the co…