MULROY, DBA MULROY DAIRY FARMS

v.

BLOCK, SECRETARY OF AGRICULTURE

Citator

Cited By (18 total)

• United States v. German Munoz-Flores, 863 F.2d 654 (9th Cir. 1988)
  …on other grounds sub. nom., Pierce v. United States, 232 U.S. 290, 34 S.Ct. 427, 58 L.Ed. 609 (1914); Bertelsen v. White, 65 F. 2d 719 (1st Cir.1933); Mulroy v. Block, 569 F.Supp. 256 (N.D.N.Y.1983), aff'd, 736 F. 2d 56 (2d Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1159, 105 S.Ct. 907, 83 L.Ed.2d 922 (1985); Moon v. Freeman, 379 F. 2d 382 (9th Cir.1967) (dicta); United States v. Ramos, 624 F.Supp. 970 (S.D.N.Y.1985); Leary v. United States, 395 U.S. 6, 21, 89 S.Ct. 1532, 1540, 23 L.Ed.2d 57 (1969); State v. Block,…
• Kochins v. Linden-Alimak, Inc., 799 F.2d 1128 (6th Cir. 1986)
  …ch, the instructions would not be a separate and distinct "product” that would trigger the running of the statute of repose in 1980. . Quoted, infra. . Accord Wayne v. Tennessee Valley Authority, 730 F. 2d 392, 403-04 (5th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1159, 105 S.Ct. 908, 83 L.Ed.2d 922 (1985), in which the Fifth Circuit rejected the due process argument that § 29-28-103 unconstitutionally curtails access to the courts. . Appellant relies on several cases from other jurisdictions in which similar pr…
• West v. Multibanco Comermex, S.A., 807 F.2d 820 (9th Cir. 1987)
  …acity of the actors involved in the suit or the governmental acts of a nondefendant state (if called into question) may serve to trigger the act of state doctrine. See, e.g., DeRoburt v. Gannett Co., Inc., 733 F. 2d 701 (9th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1159 105 S.Ct. 909, 83 L.Ed.2d 923 (1985). In general, “[w]hen the causal chain between defendant’s alleged conduct and plaintiff’s injury could not be determined without an inquiry into the motives of the foreign government, the defense has been success…