COBB

v.

NEW YORK

Citator

Cited By (17 total)

• United States v. Mechanik, 475 U.S. 66 (U.S. 1986)
  …the defendant by looking to the violation’s likely effect on the grand jury’s deliberations, not merely to its significance in fight of the trial verdict. See, e. g., United States v. Condo, 741 F. 2d 238, 239 (CA9 1984) (per curiam), cert. denied, 469 U. S. 1164(1985); United States v. Computer Sciences Corp., 689 F. 2d 1181, 1185-1186 (CA4 1982), cert. denied, 459 U. S. 1105 (1983); United States v. Kahan & Lessin Co., 695 F. 2d 1122, 1124 (CA9 1982) (per curiam); United States v. Rath, 406 F. 2d 757, (CA6…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• United States v. Stanford Champion, 813 F.2d 1154 (11th Cir. 1987)
  …indictment that specified the place of the offense as the Southern District of Florida would have sufficiently informed Slusser of the place of his alleged offense. See United States v. Harrell, 737 F. 2d 971, 975 n. 4 (11th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1164, 105 S.Ct. 923, 83 L.Ed.2d 935 (1985). Although a material variance may exist where an indictment specifies the wrong county, Slusser’s showing of prejudice amounts to a generalized allegation of inability to defend. Variance from an indictment is n…
• United States v. Busher, 817 F.2d 1409 (9th Cir. 1987)
  …able as mail fraud under section 1341. United States v. Miller, 545 F. 2d 1204, 1216 n. 17 (9th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 930, 97 S.Ct. 1549, 51 L.Ed.2d 774 (1977); see United States v. Condo, 741 F. 2d 238, 239 (9th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1164, 105 S.Ct. 924, 83 L.Ed.2d 936 (1985). It follows that such violations can serve as predicate acts of racketeering under RICO. 3. Forfeiture The jury found that Busher’s interests in ATL, J.W. Contracting and the Nevada real estate were subject to…