DALTON

v.

UNITED STATES ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Honorable Jim R. Carrigan, 804 F.2d 599 (10th Cir. 1986)
  …ce of mandamus writs to “those exceptional cases where the inferior court acted wholly without jurisdiction or so clearly abused its discretion as to constitute usurpation of power.” In re Dalton, 733 F. 2d 710, 716 (10th Cir.1984), cert. dismissed, 469 U.S. 1185,105 S.Ct. 947, 83 L.Ed.2d 959 (1985). Therefore, to grant the government’s petition in the case before us here, we must find either (1) that the district court acted wholly without jurisdiction, or (2) that the district court so clearly abused its…
• In re Magic Circle Energy Corp. v. Lindsey, 889 F.2d 950 (10th Cir. 1989)
  …a writ of prohibition under 28 U.S.C. § 1651 could be exercised to protect its prospective appellate jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 158(a). See District Court’s Order at 15 (citing In re Dalton, 733 F. 2d 710, 716 (10th Cir.1984), cert. dismissed, 469 U.S. 1185, 105 S.Ct. 947, 83 L.Ed.2d 959 (1985); Erie Bank v. United States District Court for the District of Colorado, 362 F. 2d 539, 540 (10th Cir.1966), abrogated in part on other grounds sub. nom., Liberty Nat’l Bank & Trust Co. v. Acme Tool Div. of the…
• In re Powelson, 878 F.2d 976 (7th Cir. 1989)
  …In re King Memorial Hospital, Inc., 767 F. 2d 1508, 1510 (11th Cir.1985); In re Kemble, 776 F. 2d 802, 805-06 (9th Cir.1985); In re Dalton, 733 F. 2d 710 (10th Cir.1984) (reviewable only after final judgment or by writ of mandamus), cert. dismissed, 469 U.S. 1185, 105 S.Ct. 947, 83 L.Ed.2d 959 (1985). Accordingly, a district court’s discretionary decision to withdraw a case is generally not reviewable until a final order is subsequently entered. Assuming this general principle of non-reviewability applies…