POLYAK

v.

HULEN ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Shad v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc., 799 F.2d 525 (9th Cir. 1986)
  …r.1980). A trial court commits reversible error when it expresses its opinion on an ultimate issue of fact in front of the jury or it argues for one of the parties. Handgards, Inc. v. Ethicon, Inc., 743 F. 2d 1282, 1289 (9th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1190, 105 S.Ct. 963, 83 L.Ed.2d 968 (1985); see Maheu v. Hughes Tool Co., 569 F. 2d 459, 471-72 (9th Cir.1978). In order to aid the jury in reaching a just conclusion, it is within the trial court’s discretion to call attention to evidence it believes im…
• Kennedy v. LOS Angeles Police Dep't, 887 F.2d 920 (9th Cir. 1989)
  …asions, to urge judicial restraint. See, e.g., Shad, 799 F. 2d at 531 (9th Cir.1986) (quoting Warner v. Transamerica Ins. Co., 739 F. 2d 1347, 1351 (8th Cir.1984)); Handgards, Inc. v. Ethicon, Inc., 743 F. 2d 1282, 1289 (9th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1190, 105 S.Ct. 963, 83 L.Ed.2d 968 (1985); Harris, 501 F. 2d at 10-11. The standard for reversing a verdict because of general judicial misconduct during trial is rather stringent. Handgards, 743 F. 2d at 1289. We must determine whether the district co…
• Duncan Campbell v. United States, 809 F.2d 563 (9th Cir. 1987)
  …pp. 820, 821 (N.D.Cal.1982) (awarding without discussion interest at the T-bill rate on a judgment entered before October 1, 1982 on interest accruing on or after October 1, 1982), aff'd on other grounds, 743 F. 2d 1282 (9th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1190, 105 S.Ct. 963, 83 L.Ed.2d 968 (1985); [*579] cf R.W.T. v. Dalton, 712 F. 2d 1225, 1235 (8th Cir.), (awarding interest at the T-bill rate on a judgment entered before October 1, 1982 from the date of entry of the judgment) cert. denied, 464 U.S. 100…

  ← 1 / 4 →