DAY

v.

DEANDA, JUDGE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS, ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Lane, 474 U.S. 438 (U.S. 1986)
  …possibility of a fraud. Ibid. [*444] Similarly, the false invoices submitted by Dennis Lane “gave the impression of a perfectly innocent claim.” Ibid. The Government’s petition for rehearing was denied. 741 F. 2d 1381 (1984). We granted certiorari, 469 U. S. 1206 (1985). We reverse in part and affirm in part. I — I HH The Court of Appeals held that misjoinder is inherently prejudicial.”5 735 F. 2d, at 804. The Circuits are divided on the question whether misjoinder requires automatic reversal, or whether t…
• Bender v. Williamsport Area Sch. Dist., 475 U.S. 534 (U.S. 1986)
  …rming the “more difficult adjudicative task [of carefully sifting the facts] on a case-by-case basis.” Id., at 569. The importance of the question presented by the students’ petition for certiorari persuaded us that the case merited plenary review. 469 U. S. 1206 (1985). After granting cer-tiorari, however, we noticed that neither the Board nor any of the defendants except Mr. Youngman opposed the students’ position and that only Mr. Youngman had challenged the District Court’s judgment by invoking the juris…
• United States v. Riverside Bayview Homes, Inc., 474 U.S. 121 (U.S. 1985)
  …rtiorari to consider the proper interpretation of the Corps’ regulation defining “waters of the United States” and the scope of the Corps’ jurisdiction under the Clean Water Act, both of which were called into question by the Sixth Circuit’s ruling. 469 U. S. 1206 (1985). We now reverse. M h — I The question whether the Corps of Engineers may demand that respondent obtain a permit before placing fill material on its property is primarily one of regulatory and statutory interpretation: we must determine whe…