WILDER ET AL.

v.

MOSSINGHOFF, COMMISSIONER OF PATENTS AND TRADEMARKS, ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (11 total)

• California v. Carney, 471 U.S. 386 (U.S. 1985)
  …0 U. S. 675 (1985); Oklahoma v. Castleberry, ante, p. 146. Cf. Florida v. Rodriguez, 469 U. S. 1, 12-13 (1984) (Stevens, J., dissenting, joined by Brennan, J.). See, e. g., State v. Caponi, 12 Ohio St. 3d 302, 466 N. E. 2d 551 (1984), cert. denied, 469 U. S. 1209 (1985). The Court’s inventiveness in the search and seizure area has also emboldened state legal officers to file petitions for certiorari from state court suppression orders that are explicitly based on independent state grounds. See, e. g., Jamiso…
• Scripps Clinic & Research Found. v. Genentech, Inc., 927 F.2d 1565 (Fed. Cir. 1991)
  …ld have avoided the error sought to be corrected by reissue. Failure of the attorney to claim the invention sufficiently broadly is “one of the most common sources of defects”. In re Wilder, 736 F. 2d 1516, 222 USPQ 369 (Fed.Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1209, 105 S.Ct. 1173, 84 L.Ed.2d 323 (1985): An attorney’s failure to appreciate the full scope of the invention is one of the most common sources of defects in patents. The fact that the error could have been discovered at the time of prosecution with…
• Hewlett-Packard Co. v. Bausch & Lomb Inc., 882 F.2d 1556 (Fed. Cir. 1989)
  …in immaterial details. Our precedent rejects B & L’s simplistic interpretation of the reissue statute with respect to what constitutes error under section 251. As explained in In re Wilder, 736 F. 2d 1516, 222 USPQ 369 (Fed.Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1209, 105 S.Ct. 1173, 84 L.Ed.2d 323 (1985): There are two distinct statutory requirements that a reissue oath or declaration must satisfy. First, it must state that the patent is defective or partly inoperative or invalid because of defects in the spec…