CHAMBERLAIN

v.

ERICKSON, WARDEN

Citator

Cited By (23 total)

• Traylor v. State, 596 So. 2d 957 (Fla. 1992)
  …ly recognized that an attorney can assert a Fifth Amendment right on behalf of the client in dealings with the police. Janecka v. State, 739 S.W. 2d 813, 828 (Tex.Crim.App.1987); Wilkerson v. State, 657 S.W. 2d 784 (Tex.Crim.App.1983), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1008, 105 S.Ct. 1371, 84 L.Ed.2d 390 (1985); Phifer v. State, 651 S.W. 2d 774 (Tex.Crim.App.1983); Stone v. State, 612 S.W. 2d 542 (Tex.Crim.App.1981); Williams v. State, 566 S.W. 2d 919 (Tex.Crim.App.1978). A similar conclusion was reached by the Oregon…
• Farr v. State, 656 So. 2d 448 (Fla. 1995)
  …le if the defendant and appellate counsel are in material disagreement. Id. at 123-24. Some other courts, however, seem to have concluded that Faretta applies fully on appeal. Chamberlain v. Ericksen, 744 F. 2d 628, 630 (8th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1008, 105 S.Ct. 1368, 84 L.Ed.2d 387 (1985). Still other Courts have found that the equivalent of Faretta rights exists by way of statute or court rule. E.g., State v. Seifert, 423 N.W. 2d 368 (Minn.1988). I find this last category of eases all the more…
• Bailey v. Bd. OF Cnty. Comm'rs, 659 So. 2d 295 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994)
  …t to cause a person of reasonable caution to believe that an offense has been or is being committed.” Wilson v. Attaway, 757 F. 2d 1227, 1235 (11th Cir.1985) (quoting United States v. Pantoja-Soto, 739 F. 2d 1520, 1523 (11th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1008, 105 S.Ct. 1369, 84 L.Ed.2d 389 (1985). . As previously noted, the City, County, and Hin-dery had been dismissed from the federal court action on this pendant state claim on the basis of sovereign immunity; this and all other pendant state claims a…