BOUTA

v.

AMERICAN FEDERATION OF STATE, COUNTY & MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES

Citator

Cited By (12 total)

• Klehr et ux. v. A. O. Smith Corp., 521 U.S. 179 (U.S. 1997)
  …inney Dock & Transport Co. v. Norfolk & Western R. Co., 488 U. S. 880 (1988); New York v. Hendrickson Bros., Inc., 840 F. 2d 1065, 1083 (CA2), cert. denied, 488 U. S. 848 (1988); Berkson v. Del Monte Corp., 743 F. 2d 53, 56 (CA1 1984), cert. denied, 470 U. S. 1056 (1985); Charlotte Telecasters, Inc. v. Jefferson-Pilot Corp., 546 F. 2d 570, 574 (CA4 1976). Second, those courts that do not require “reasonable diligence” have said that the “fraudulent concealment” doctrine seeks to punish defendants for affirma…
• Grooms v. J.C. Keeney, 826 F.2d 883 (9th Cir. 1987)
  …bypass of state remedies preceded Batchelor’s warning, and the time for direct appeal has expired, the state’s failure to object to the procedural default will be treated as a waiver. Branch v. Cupp, 736 F. 2d 533, 535 (9th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1056, 105 S.Ct. 1764, 84 L.Ed.2d 826 (1985); Allbee v. Cupp, 716 F. 2d 635, 635 (9th Cir.1983); Batchelor, 693 F. 2d at 863-64. Since Grooms’s conviction was affirmed by the Oregon Court of Appeals on August 25, 1980, Grooms, 47 Or.App. at 1041, 615 P. 2…
• Rodriguez v. Banco Central, 917 F.2d 664 (1st Cir. 1990)
  …mitted an antitrust plaintiff in analogous [*668] circumstances to bring a suit, for they have found the statute of limitations tolled by “fraudulent concealment.” See, e.g., Berkson v. Del Monte Corp., 743 F. 2d 53, 55 (1st Cir.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1056, 105 S.Ct. 1765, 84 L.Ed.2d 826 (1985). One can easily imagine the development of an analogous “tolling” doctrine in RICO cases. See Bath, 913 F. 2d at 820 (noting that “[standard tolling exceptions continue to apply”); Rhoades, 859 F. 2d at 1105…