LEE

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (61 total)

• United States v. Vaccaro, 816 F.2d 443 (9th Cir. 1987)
  …hat the evidence would have been suppressed or that there is a reasonable probability that he would have been acquitted had this evidence been excluded. See United States v. Schaflander, 743 F. 2d 714, 720 (9th Cir. 1984) (per curiam), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1058, 105 S.Ct. 1772, 84 L.Ed.2d 832 (1985). Moreover, there was overwhelming evi [*456] dence establishing Cushing’s guilt independent of the evidence found in his house, including the testimony of several participant witnesses regarding his involvement…
• United States v. Mandell Jackson, 935 F.2d 832 (7th Cir. 1991)
  …f counsel to fail to present expert to testify as to unreliability of eyewitness testimony where likelihood of misidentification was fully explored on cross-examination); United States v. Schaflander, 743 F. 2d 714, 718 (9th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1058, 105 S.Ct. 1772, 84 L.Ed.2d 832 (1985) (not ineffective assistance to fail to interview defense witnesses where testimony would have been cumulative of that presented by witnesses who did testify at trial). As Judge Leventhal wrote in United State…
• Libretti v. United States, 516 U.S. 29 (U.S. 1995)
  …. Compare United States v. Reckmeyer, 786 F. 2d 1216, 1222 (CA4) (Rule 11(f) applies to forfeiture provisions in plea agreements), cert. denied, 479 U. S. 850 (1986), and United States v. Roberts, 749 F. 2d 404, 409 (CA7 1984) (same), cert. denied, 470 U. S. 1058 (1985), with United States v. Boatner, 966 F. 2d 1575, 1581 (CA11 1992) (Rule 11(f) does not apply to stipulated forfeiture provisions in plea agreements), United States v. Bachynsky, 949 F. 2d 722, 730-731 (CA5 1991) (Rule 11(f) does not apply to f…