WHITE

v.

DOUGHERTY COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (11 total)

• Martin v. Dist. of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U.S. 1 (U.S. 1992)
  …1) (per curiam). I continue to adhere to the views expressed in the dissenting opinions filed in those cases, and in the dissenting opinion I filed in Zatko v. California, 502 U. S. 16, 18 (1991) (per curiam). See also Talamini v. Allstate Ins. Co., 470 U. S. 1067 (1985), appeal dism’d (Stevens, J., concurring).…
• In re Sindram, 498 U.S. 177 (U.S. 1991)
  …view, however, the minimal annoyance these litigants might cause is well worth the cost. Our longstanding tradition of leaving our door open to all classes of litigants is a proud and decent one worth maintaining. See Talamini v. Allstate Ins. Co., 470 U. S. 1067, 1070 (1985) (Stevens, J., concurring). Moreover, we should not presume in advance that prolific indigent litigants will never bring a meritorious claim. Nor should we lose sight of the important role informa pauperis claims have played in shaping…
• Operating Eng'rs Pension Tr. v. A-C Co., 859 F.2d 1336 (9th Cir. 1988)
  …ter the legitimate exercise of the right to seek a peaceful redress of grievances through judicial means.... [T]he strong presumption is against the imposition of sanctions for invoking the processes of the law. Talamini v. All-State Insurance Co., 470 U.S. 1067, 105 S.Ct. 1824, 1827-28, 85 L.Ed.2d 125 (1985) (Stevens, J., joined by Brennan, Marshall and Blackman, concurring). We agree with Justice Stevens that judges must not, by imposing sanctions unnecessarily, discourage the filing of good faith actions…