SWANSON

v.

MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Finn v. Prudential-Bache Sec., Inc., 523 So. 2d 617 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988)
  …l arbitration of pendent arbitrable claims when one of the parties files a motion to compel, even where the result would be the possibly inefficient maintenance of separate proceedings in different forums. Thereafter, in Oppenheimer & Co. v. Young, 470 U.S. 1078, 105 S.Ct. 1830, 85 L.Ed.2d 131 (1985), on the authority of Byrd, the U.S. Supreme Court vacated and remanded the Florida Supreme Court’s decision in Oppenheimer, and on remand the Florida Supreme Court quashed the district court’s decision and reje…
• Bing v. A.G. Edwards & Sons, Inc., 498 So. 2d 1279 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986)
  …r 17, 1984, granting the present appellants’ motion to rehear the trial court’s original order which compelled arbitration. The trial court granted the motion for rehearing and made two relevant findings; namely, (a) that Oppenheimer & Co. v. Young, 470 U.S. 1078, 105 S.Ct. 1830, 85 L.Ed.2d 131 (1985), was now controlling, citing to Ingerson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, 272 So. 2d 862, 864 (Fla. 3d DCA 1973); and (b) that appellee’s memorandum had authorized appellants to resolve the di…
• Montgomery Distribs., Inc. v. G. Heileman Brewing Co., Inc., 505 So. 2d 443 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986)
  …arbitration and ruled that claims under a state securities act, which were formerly nonarbitrable, are now subject to arbitration. See also Oppenheimer & Co. v. Young, 434 So. 2d 369 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983), affirmed, 456 So. 2d 1175 (Fla.1984), vacated, 470 U.S. 1078, 105 S.Ct. 1830, 85 L.Ed.2d 131 (1985). In Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc., 473 U.S. 614, 105 S.Ct. 3346, 3355, 87 L.Ed.2d 444 (1985), the Supreme Court allowed arbitration of antitrust claims in an international case but…