PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC CO.
v.
PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF CALIFORNIA ET AL.

U.S. | 1985-03-25
No. 84-1044
470 U.S. 1083 Supreme Court of the United States (1985) Positive Treatment
Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Regents of the Univ. of Mich. v. Ewing, 474 U.S. 214 (U.S. 1985)
    …wing to retake the NBME Part I, and if he should pass, to reinstate him in the Inteflex program. We granted the University’s petition for certiorari to consider whether the Court of Appeals had misapplied the doctrine of “substantive due process.”6 470 U. S. 1083 (1985). We now reverse. [*222] HH HH HH In Board of Curators, Univ. of Mo. v. Horowitz, 435 U. S. 78, 91-92 (1978), we assumed, without deciding, that federal courts can review an academic decision of a public educational institution under a substa…
  • Davis v. Bandemer, 478 U.S. 109 (U.S. 1986)
    …trict Court invalidated the statute.7 [*118] The defendants appealed, seeking review of the District Court’s rulings that the case was justiciable and that, if justiciable, an equal protection violation had occurred.8 We noted probable jurisdiction. 470 U. S. 1083 (1985). I — I H-H We address first the question whether this case presents a justiciable controversy or a nonjusticiable political question. Although the District Court never explicitly stated that the case was justiciable, its holding clearly res…
  • …right not to help spread a message with which it disagrees, see Wooley v. Maynard, 430 U. S. 705 (1977), and that the Commission’s order infringes that right. The California Supreme Court denied discretionary review. We noted probable jurisdiction, 470 U. S. 1083 (1985), and now reverse. [*8] II The constitutional guarantee of free speech “serves significant societal interests” wholly apart from the speaker’s interest in self-expression. First National Bank of Boston v. Bellotti, 435 U. S. 765, 776 (1978).…

Previewing 3 of 7 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw